Webb ranks alternative media is the least trustworthy in his opinion of media with the most trustworthy being "Pulitzer" winners, followed by "Pulitzer" nominated and so on. Guccifer and Larry Nichols aren't Pulutzer prize winners so George probably doesn't put much stock in what they say even if Larry Nichols stood side by side with the Clintons for decades. I don't know his background but obviously he trusts the Establishment MSM a bit too much.
So the information he presents for the most part that makes sense comes from his sources in the FBI in conjunction with his media sources. The rest of it like "obama good" and "why doesn't everybody just go back to morality and walk away from this now and not go down with Hillary" is his naïveté showing.
It's not naïveté, he's been active on twitter for years. He's a gatekeeper, his job is to pooh-pooh the more sordid claims. His early vids were deleted by himself most likely because he claimed the pedo-trafficking aspect to this was bunk and that pizza meant weapons etc. He used to chime in to gamergate discussions and was never on the side of truth or facts which is why I instinctually distrust him.
Thanks for that info! I've been thinking that maybe It was too hasty and easy to attribute naïveté to him. To be honest as soon as he started talking about how good and innocent obama is, I began to distrust him too. Although the rest of the info he talks about does ring true, do you agree?
Yes, it does. But I think that's his intention. People here are getting red-pilled fast and he's feeding naive diggers mountains of them. Focus is dissipating away from the wl emails into a conspiracy rabbithole. It would take all day to research all the shit in his vids and that's the point of him being spammed here every day.
view the rest of the comments →
Sharipie ago
Webb ranks alternative media is the least trustworthy in his opinion of media with the most trustworthy being "Pulitzer" winners, followed by "Pulitzer" nominated and so on. Guccifer and Larry Nichols aren't Pulutzer prize winners so George probably doesn't put much stock in what they say even if Larry Nichols stood side by side with the Clintons for decades. I don't know his background but obviously he trusts the Establishment MSM a bit too much.
So the information he presents for the most part that makes sense comes from his sources in the FBI in conjunction with his media sources. The rest of it like "obama good" and "why doesn't everybody just go back to morality and walk away from this now and not go down with Hillary" is his naïveté showing.
Yates ago
It's not naïveté, he's been active on twitter for years. He's a gatekeeper, his job is to pooh-pooh the more sordid claims. His early vids were deleted by himself most likely because he claimed the pedo-trafficking aspect to this was bunk and that pizza meant weapons etc. He used to chime in to gamergate discussions and was never on the side of truth or facts which is why I instinctually distrust him.
Sharipie ago
Thanks for that info! I've been thinking that maybe It was too hasty and easy to attribute naïveté to him. To be honest as soon as he started talking about how good and innocent obama is, I began to distrust him too. Although the rest of the info he talks about does ring true, do you agree?
Yates ago
Yes, it does. But I think that's his intention. People here are getting red-pilled fast and he's feeding naive diggers mountains of them. Focus is dissipating away from the wl emails into a conspiracy rabbithole. It would take all day to research all the shit in his vids and that's the point of him being spammed here every day.