You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

My thought is this could easily be disinformation, unless some kind of evidence is provided.

DefenderOfTruth ago

Good point. This can be used to corroborate with other evidence, but without other leads (& I don't have anything else at the moment), this could be a dead end.

At the beginning of that book appendix there's a note:

Fritz Springmeier originally exposed many of these sites in 1993, so it is possible they have made some changes since they were originally exposed. Most of these operated for years, and may still be operating. We are aware of that some of their programming bases have been moved after exposure.

Stellarjay ago

I think these books are being overlooked. They contain so much info.

DefenderOfTruth ago

Yes! I know some books are dated (goes to show how long this has been going on!) and that's why their evidence has to be compared to today's sources, but once you learn how these people think, it's easy to see how they repeat processes and patterns. You can predict what they'll do next and how they'll go about it.