I was watching Milo's videos of his political standpoints, then stumbled upon this interview.
I admire Milo's opinions about a lot of things and think he's a good guy. Pay attention to what he says especially near the end. It seems as if pedophilia is normalized among specific social circles in Hollywood and among the elites, and that among them it is not viewed as immoral.
Furthermore I would not be surprised if it is in the liberalist agenda to lower the age of consent, and to make people believe that children have the capacity to consent to sexual acts.
Think about it - Far left liberals advocate such things as giving kids hormones if they believe they have been "misgendered". If they think that kids have the capacity to make decisions regarding this, then I wouldn't be surprised if they believe that children have the capacity to consent.
The problem i see with your analysis is that historically the age of consent has been around the age of puberty and possibility of childbearing. If girls are gonna have sex at 14 as they do now it may as well be in matrimony. All social science indicates that the fewer sexual partners a woman has the higher her chances for material success and happiness. The raise of age of consent laws itself is probably the same liberal bullshit that has led to both parties guaranteeing that "kids" up to age 26 can rely on mommy for healthcare.
I think their agenda of earlier sex ed etc is just another example of their disastrous good intentions. Promoting licentiousness is their raison d'être and they know they're raising kids into a sea of STDs, so they probably see free condoms as necessary
view the rest of the comments →
Gannicus11 ago
I was watching Milo's videos of his political standpoints, then stumbled upon this interview.
I admire Milo's opinions about a lot of things and think he's a good guy. Pay attention to what he says especially near the end. It seems as if pedophilia is normalized among specific social circles in Hollywood and among the elites, and that among them it is not viewed as immoral.
Furthermore I would not be surprised if it is in the liberalist agenda to lower the age of consent, and to make people believe that children have the capacity to consent to sexual acts.
Think about it - Far left liberals advocate such things as giving kids hormones if they believe they have been "misgendered". If they think that kids have the capacity to make decisions regarding this, then I wouldn't be surprised if they believe that children have the capacity to consent.
I would love to hear what anyone else thinks
Don-Keyhote ago
The problem i see with your analysis is that historically the age of consent has been around the age of puberty and possibility of childbearing. If girls are gonna have sex at 14 as they do now it may as well be in matrimony. All social science indicates that the fewer sexual partners a woman has the higher her chances for material success and happiness. The raise of age of consent laws itself is probably the same liberal bullshit that has led to both parties guaranteeing that "kids" up to age 26 can rely on mommy for healthcare.
I think their agenda of earlier sex ed etc is just another example of their disastrous good intentions. Promoting licentiousness is their raison d'être and they know they're raising kids into a sea of STDs, so they probably see free condoms as necessary