You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Lordcantido, we have made some improvements over the past few weeks due to serious flooding problems that bury the hard-hitting, linked-source backed submissions that move this investigation forward. Please give the sidebar submission guidelines a thorough read, and edit this post to succinctly state the evidence for the premise in your title, with links to the evidence. Please remove all the meta discussion. Otherwise, this will be removed by mods for failing to meet Rules 2 and 4. Alternatively, you can post this in v/pizzagatewhatever.

I will leave this up a bit longer.

lordcantido ago

Option A: I remove all meta discussion, add a proper link, then continue with the meta discussion in the comments as a obnoxious-as-fuck workaround.

Option B (the reasonable one): I add a proper link, and I add a disclaimer that states meta discussion ahead and people make up their minds on their own.

Don't be a fascist, this post is quality.

Millennial_Falcon ago

Another mod here. Your post makes some great points about the sub being taken for a ride by posts that jump to conclusions without evidence. I hope you will at least take the step of adding some appropriate links so it doesn't get removed. I would also recommend working on brevity. Brevity is the soul of wit. Being able to make your points in an incisive, condensed, and systematic fashion is an important skill. Your paragraphs are way too big.

Vindicator ago

Option C: Post in the proper sub for meta discussions <------- This One

lordcantido ago

Because I'm sure it'll get tons of traffic there. Go ahead and delete it then shithead... It's your fault if my prediction comes to pass btw.

Vindicator ago

Thanks for adding the link. What would be really helpful is if either you, or one the commentors, added some additional links of the zoomed-in bits you are discussing in detail. It would significantly undergird your argument.

One of the reasons we all agreed to the submission requirements that we did, after discussing them for weeks, is to increase the red-pill potency of the content. And to help people discern exactly what you are advocating -- false flags and wild goose chases.

Investigate1999 ago

What is the point of his post? Would you summarize, please?