While Googling the judge's name, I came across this article about an unrelated case, in which a 19-year-old college student who had previously worked at a day care center was accused of sending CP to an undercover FBI agent. http://archive.is/VbVVj This was the second time the woman's activities had come to the attention of federal authorities. The Department of Homeland Security had investigated her for distributing CP a year earlier, but didn't charge her--instead, DHS just warned her to quit her job. Because the woman uploaded the porn to Dropbox in the second incident, her lawyer argued that she hadn't really "distributed" the porn. As to how G. Michael Harvey fits into this, the article mentions that he said he'd never seen a case like this, and that he was "concerned if the pornography was distributed from Virginia to D.C." Just to clarify, "concerned" here most likely means his court would have jurisdiction in the case only if the porn was distributed to D.C.
view the rest of the comments →
zoltan907 ago
The judge in the case will be U.S. Magistrate G. Michael Harvey. http://archive.is/ja9bg
Welch's attorney is Dani Jahn. http://archive.is/WoQcJ
While Googling the judge's name, I came across this article about an unrelated case, in which a 19-year-old college student who had previously worked at a day care center was accused of sending CP to an undercover FBI agent. http://archive.is/VbVVj This was the second time the woman's activities had come to the attention of federal authorities. The Department of Homeland Security had investigated her for distributing CP a year earlier, but didn't charge her--instead, DHS just warned her to quit her job. Because the woman uploaded the porn to Dropbox in the second incident, her lawyer argued that she hadn't really "distributed" the porn. As to how G. Michael Harvey fits into this, the article mentions that he said he'd never seen a case like this, and that he was "concerned if the pornography was distributed from Virginia to D.C." Just to clarify, "concerned" here most likely means his court would have jurisdiction in the case only if the porn was distributed to D.C.
noworldorder ago
To the top!
Theupsidedown ago
Don't make stupid fucking comments like this. If you don't have anything of any substance to say, don't say anything.