No shit Watson. You're much too stupid to set up an operation as sophisticated as Wikileaks. Besides, you'd probably proclaim that you're the messiah and kill yourself if you did because you seem like the emotional type. I'd explain to you that perhaps the reason the information "humanity needs" hasn't been released en masse is because they haven't had a chance to review it but I'm sure you probably have some dicks to suck or something of that nature.
I need to remove this submission per rule 1 as no connection to Pizzagate has been demonstrated. In order to resubmit, please make sure to explain the relevance of your post, or try posting this to /v/pizzagatewhatever instead. Thank you.
What do you mean... It wasn't their fault. It was an "analyst's" fault.
Pure fucking scum they are. Like obviously the apology is shit to begin with.... But they take it to a whole other level, by placing the blame on an anonymous "analyst".
Either take responsibility as a whole (CNN IS SORRY) OR at least give a name to the person you're blaming for the latest massive fuck up. Either way, I hope they are destroyed.
Cnn is such a joke. I read in one of the threads about how the elites feed bits and pieces to the media to see how far people will go or if they even notice. So few have been noticing till now.
Cnn has no credibility whatsoever and I think you will see more and more nonsense being fed to the ignorant masses. The drunk reporter is an example.
Dear CNN, only one question: When's the court date? Suggestion: ask Jake Tapper to represent you; his wife thinks Comet Ping Pong is the best restaurant in the world!
Fuck you, CNN! These people are such assholes. JA had to team up with Hannity because the liberal media clearly wouldn't touch this story/interview with a 10-foot pole. I call bullshit on this one.
"He is the Christ figure that must be sacrificed in order to usher in a new era of freedom and transparency. Christcucks are all the same. They are willing to accept someone else's sacrifice but could never imagine making one themselves."
You also have to take into account time vs reward. To most people that can actually be defamed, the amount of time they would have to put into proving a detriment in court outweighs the reward of them proving that.
I'm sure Assange is several factorials smarter than you which is why he hasn't killed himself. Why don't you send your regards to Wikileaks and his family since you seem to know so much about heroics? When you're done with that you should probably ask yourself what makes your life worth living.
Hahaha fuck these people are absolute morons! We apologize for saying that but...... He is facing sexual assault charges, we're not saying that it was with minors but we're still saying it haha 2017 the year the TRUTH will be made available
well, no, that's not accurate. If you do a front page pedo smear and do a page 24 tiny type 'retraction' the accused still has a shot in court that the retraction was not sufficiently broadcast to undo the reputational damage
our overburdened court system would not hold up if all retractions were meaningless as even genuine inadvertent errors could then be taken to court. That said - is this retraction sufficient to undo the alleged libel ? maybe not given the mealy mouthed churlish rehash of the dodgy swedish allegations
this does not meet wikileaks ultimatum - the one hour special. So wikileaks may still sue (although a court may decide the tweeted apology was sufficient and not force a remedy settlement)
Nope, because they were offered an easy out and they refused. They could have disavowed themselves by trying to pass the goof off on their guest instead of proactively embracing the remark with a backhanded "apology" which still amounts to slander/libel. If anything this proves bad faith was involved.
Admits no evidence ... they're all losers. Pathetic losers. Can't wait until Trump gets in. I'm praying he's not another jerk. Well, I'm not even asking for that. He can be flawed, I just don't want him to be tolerant of pedophiles and of this criminality.
"And an obscure Swedish law was invoked. It is sometimes called the "surprise sex" law. In essence, it holds that if a woman withdraws her consent at any point during intercourse, and the man continues, it becomes rape. This transition from consensual to non-consensual sex is what Assange is accused of. All this will have to be proved in the court — a Swedish one."
I might have read that the women have now changed their minds about pursuing this, but I could be wrong.
yes, the 2 women involved were persuaded by swedish authorities to divulge any 'dissatisfaction'; with their encounters with assange, which the swedish state then used without the consent of the women (ironic, huh?) to construe as rape. The women themselves are not pushing the charges. More granular detail in all the comments on the twitter feed in this posts link
It's such horseshit. Of course they bring up the bullshit sexual assault charge being brought by the state of Sweden, which the women are not even behind.
thestormking ago
You may be onto something here. Every time I read another one of your idiotic replies I feel a little bit dumber.
thestormking ago
No shit Watson. You're much too stupid to set up an operation as sophisticated as Wikileaks. Besides, you'd probably proclaim that you're the messiah and kill yourself if you did because you seem like the emotional type. I'd explain to you that perhaps the reason the information "humanity needs" hasn't been released en masse is because they haven't had a chance to review it but I'm sure you probably have some dicks to suck or something of that nature.
thestormking ago
My apologies. I was referring to the cocksucker before you.
thestormking ago
Of course not. He's just "the Christ figure that must be sacrificed in order to usher in a new era of freedom and transparency" according to you.
thestormking ago
No. Just the cocksucker replying to me.
wecanhelp ago
I need to remove this submission per rule 1 as no connection to Pizzagate has been demonstrated. In order to resubmit, please make sure to explain the relevance of your post, or try posting this to /v/pizzagatewhatever instead. Thank you.
IlluminatiKing ago
"Apology"
FuckUredditFuckuSpez ago
What do you mean... It wasn't their fault. It was an "analyst's" fault.
Pure fucking scum they are. Like obviously the apology is shit to begin with.... But they take it to a whole other level, by placing the blame on an anonymous "analyst".
Either take responsibility as a whole (CNN IS SORRY) OR at least give a name to the person you're blaming for the latest massive fuck up. Either way, I hope they are destroyed.
Sharipie ago
sue these basterds, Julian! Own them!
Stellarjay ago
Cnn is such a joke. I read in one of the threads about how the elites feed bits and pieces to the media to see how far people will go or if they even notice. So few have been noticing till now. Cnn has no credibility whatsoever and I think you will see more and more nonsense being fed to the ignorant masses. The drunk reporter is an example.
doubletake ago
Dear CNN, only one question: When's the court date? Suggestion: ask Jake Tapper to represent you; his wife thinks Comet Ping Pong is the best restaurant in the world!
sunshine702 ago
Nope! Thiel vs Gawker time.
And as one of the conditions when bankrupt is CNN will now be called WIkiNewsNetwork :). I will enjoy tuning in
HereticalPeasant ago
I'd pay to watch that
mrjdouble ago
Fuck you, CNN! These people are such assholes. JA had to team up with Hannity because the liberal media clearly wouldn't touch this story/interview with a 10-foot pole. I call bullshit on this one.
thestormking ago
"He is the Christ figure that must be sacrificed in order to usher in a new era of freedom and transparency. Christcucks are all the same. They are willing to accept someone else's sacrifice but could never imagine making one themselves."
You just described yourself.
gosso920 ago
"We realize that the women Julian Assange raped were of legal age. CNN regrets the error." - CNN
wokethefkup ago
Slander beginning with a fake apology. Nice we see what u doing there.
Beaucephus ago
You also have to take into account time vs reward. To most people that can actually be defamed, the amount of time they would have to put into proving a detriment in court outweighs the reward of them proving that.
Ksolver ago
How childish.
dickface8 ago
The past 10 years will be made into a killer movie someday.
thestormking ago
I'm sure Assange is several factorials smarter than you which is why he hasn't killed himself. Why don't you send your regards to Wikileaks and his family since you seem to know so much about heroics? When you're done with that you should probably ask yourself what makes your life worth living.
goodguy1367 ago
Hahaha fuck these people are absolute morons! We apologize for saying that but...... He is facing sexual assault charges, we're not saying that it was with minors but we're still saying it haha 2017 the year the TRUTH will be made available
MolochHunter ago
well, no, that's not accurate. If you do a front page pedo smear and do a page 24 tiny type 'retraction' the accused still has a shot in court that the retraction was not sufficiently broadcast to undo the reputational damage
goatsandbros ago
Now, now, CNN. Those weren't the conditions! The lawsuit's still on!
SuperDoobie ago
CNN apologizes and prints a retraction.
The kidnapping criminals in Chicago are charged with hate crimes.
Has the world gone crazy or maybe America is already getting great again.
MolochHunter ago
our overburdened court system would not hold up if all retractions were meaningless as even genuine inadvertent errors could then be taken to court. That said - is this retraction sufficient to undo the alleged libel ? maybe not given the mealy mouthed churlish rehash of the dodgy swedish allegations
MolochHunter ago
this does not meet wikileaks ultimatum - the one hour special. So wikileaks may still sue (although a court may decide the tweeted apology was sufficient and not force a remedy settlement)
thestormking ago
Nope, because they were offered an easy out and they refused. They could have disavowed themselves by trying to pass the goof off on their guest instead of proactively embracing the remark with a backhanded "apology" which still amounts to slander/libel. If anything this proves bad faith was involved.
quantokitty ago
Admits no evidence ... they're all losers. Pathetic losers. Can't wait until Trump gets in. I'm praying he's not another jerk. Well, I'm not even asking for that. He can be flawed, I just don't want him to be tolerant of pedophiles and of this criminality.
gopluckyourself ago
Where's my 1 hour expose... I WANTED THE 1 HOUR EXPOSE REEEEEEEEE lol
Bill_Murrays_Sandals ago
Fake news from CNN. Who would've guessed?
retreaux ago
Assange needs to leak everything he can.
con77 ago
werent the original charges discredited?
AugustaJulia ago
They had a disagreement about the use of a condom, but it took several days before they reported it as rape to the police.
Here is an article about it: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Sex-accusers-boasted-about-their-conquest-of-WikiLeaks-founder-Julian-Assange/articleshow/7068149.cms
"And an obscure Swedish law was invoked. It is sometimes called the "surprise sex" law. In essence, it holds that if a woman withdraws her consent at any point during intercourse, and the man continues, it becomes rape. This transition from consensual to non-consensual sex is what Assange is accused of. All this will have to be proved in the court — a Swedish one."
I might have read that the women have now changed their minds about pursuing this, but I could be wrong.
MolochHunter ago
yes, the 2 women involved were persuaded by swedish authorities to divulge any 'dissatisfaction'; with their encounters with assange, which the swedish state then used without the consent of the women (ironic, huh?) to construe as rape. The women themselves are not pushing the charges. More granular detail in all the comments on the twitter feed in this posts link
sunshine702 ago
It was venue shopped because of Sweeden's laws. Consider some Wiki swag.
Theupsidedown ago
It's such horseshit. Of course they bring up the bullshit sexual assault charge being brought by the state of Sweden, which the women are not even behind.
derram ago
https://tweetsave.com/newday/status/816713773939621890 :
This has been an automated message.