(1) ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. (Click Here to Read the Pizzagate Definition) It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
You're kidding me! The opening discussion is related to the title, which is pizzagate. It is very clear and there's no way I can dumb it down and connect the dots any more than this.
Not at all. No connection to child trafficking/molseting/fucking in the first three paragraphs, OR the title.
(1) ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. (Click Here to Read the Pizzagate Definition) It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
The child holding camp is pizzagate!
The article questioned if they were using it as a holding camp for the purpose of TRAFFICKING! Obviously not a school daycare, since this is on a pizzagate forum I'm assuming y'all know we're talking about PG. If the proximity for the camp(s) to military bases are used for easier cover-up.
I wrote that. How would you think that's not pizzagate?
More than that, though, you're not only wasting one mod's time, but all of them that take the time to review your post, and all the users' time trawling through things just to find out why your post is relevant.
It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance.
Not hide it in a post with irrelevant titles and paragraphs before and after.
I don’t know where this specific Texas fema camp is located, but I do know that the amount of military bases in Texas would make easy government trafficking cover-up.
4th paragraph. I had to read 3 paragraphs to get there, and then it's only "would make easy... ... coverup".
Mods dont' have time to sift through every wall of text to find Waldo. Put the takeaway in the title, and again at the top of the post. We get shit-tier troll posts like this all the time, if yours isn't a troll post, make the connection where it is easily seen.
Had you made this line top, or even copied it, or made it the damn title it would be fine. Stop making more work for others because you're too lazy to highlight the takeaway.
Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation.
Brief. As in, not an entire post to find where you think it would make a good coverup.
view the rest of the comments →
Crensch ago
(1) ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. (Click Here to Read the Pizzagate Definition) It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
Not directly related. Link them, or post at /v/pizzagatewhatever.
cosmicmind ago
You're kidding me! The opening discussion is related to the title, which is pizzagate. It is very clear and there's no way I can dumb it down and connect the dots any more than this.
Crensch ago
Not at all. No connection to child trafficking/molseting/fucking in the first three paragraphs, OR the title.
(1) ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. (Click Here to Read the Pizzagate Definition) It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
cosmicmind ago
The child holding camp is pizzagate!
The article questioned if they were using it as a holding camp for the purpose of TRAFFICKING! Obviously not a school daycare, since this is on a pizzagate forum I'm assuming y'all know we're talking about PG. If the proximity for the camp(s) to military bases are used for easier cover-up. I wrote that. How would you think that's not pizzagate?
Crensch ago
More than that, though, you're not only wasting one mod's time, but all of them that take the time to review your post, and all the users' time trawling through things just to find out why your post is relevant.
Not hide it in a post with irrelevant titles and paragraphs before and after.
Crensch ago
4th paragraph. I had to read 3 paragraphs to get there, and then it's only "would make easy... ... coverup".
Mods dont' have time to sift through every wall of text to find Waldo. Put the takeaway in the title, and again at the top of the post. We get shit-tier troll posts like this all the time, if yours isn't a troll post, make the connection where it is easily seen.
Had you made this line top, or even copied it, or made it the damn title it would be fine. Stop making more work for others because you're too lazy to highlight the takeaway.
Brief. As in, not an entire post to find where you think it would make a good coverup.