You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

zoltan907 ago

Try the SMTP id: e63csp284426lfb.

zoltan907 ago

Or this one: g68mr68626420yke.23.1417453546962.

Fateswebb ago

As well there could be other clues in the header

Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.25.80.66 with SMTP id e63csp284426lfb; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:05:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: meganrouse@gmail.com Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.170.189.71 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.170.189.71 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 10.170.189.71 as permitted sender) [email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected] X-Received: from mr.google.com ([10.170.189.71]) by 10.170.189.71 with SMTP id g68mr68626420yke.23.1417453546962 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 01 Dec 2014 09:05:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YwfF42i3GM9DT9GZjh7pueHMlRKqdzPk7BKfnvWiIRw=; b=wmViF0H87Wk++WEOxiAgV2jARiFAWmwWzg1DsHXXxhlKQHruhwZYvXmijwr1afJOle CVGEqpkOAqdPjiTooFoin3q44DFoAva+jDOAZ8VjyAVJkIgJJam0m3meUhh1QXTH6h5c Fe3hIHdqOylKG07JTog45V0ofh8Qa/pUfzIA0kMfR43z2tr7ng87yeDSuE1IXiKRwTV5 sWnfPP4tdNLaFhNtEz3CkGtf8rKvAsKGJFAetZdRwSuxSsGp3ejQ31ANb451Jl4h6S60 6/ujXbCJwyNnpNkG5yrDN9syfHAzA3XCRAOuhoVJE68Dfc7U7myR28dgoeZYY2kNrKiy yPtA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.189.71 with SMTP id g68mr68626420yke.23.1417453546899; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 09:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.151.4 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.151.4 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:05:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:05:46 -0800 Message-ID: CAAVDwMKxTaZ-WA8Jz5zM1ok1+cbEpak3sS53G=yrWP=4+CUojw@mail.gmail.com Subject: Action shot From: Megan Rouse meganrouse@gmail.com To: Mae Podesta mpodesta@gmail.com, Mom podesta.mary@gmail.com, John Podesta john.podesta@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a11398856260e4a05092a9fc0

--001a11398856260e4a05092a9fc0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11398856260e4505092a9fbe

--001a11398856260e4505092a9fbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

--001a11398856260e4505092a9fbe Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

--001a11398856260e4505092a9fbe--

--001a11398856260e4a05092a9fc0

ansipizza ago

Naive question: if the picture was emailed as an attachment, and it was already steganographically altered, then most of the information in the email header didn't exist when the password was selected. Am I missing something?

Fateswebb ago

Exactly, I was thinking that as well, however you could make a stenography program that also has an email client, so while it's a great point I was going off the fact that they has said another pictures password was the smtp ID. But I also had thought he same thing that it seems unlikely.