I was using a Steganography detection software and it flagged the following image as using a steganography method called "jphide": http://i.imgur.com/a3pUmpH.jpg
Now, the thing is that when I try to use Jphide to uncover the data it asks for a password, and the only thing I had to try with was the filename, but because I originally found the image from THIS site http://hollaforums.com/thread/8067477/politics/open-directory-found-from-the-podesta-emails-large.html and on the site the image was called "1477744604436.jpg" (which does not seem to be the original name from the Podesta emails because when I searched for that filename it didn't come up with any results). I therefore need YOUR help in finding the Podesta e-mail from where this photo was taken from, so that we can see if there are any suggestions of a password that we can use to crack the image file. Most probably the password will be the name of the original file, so if ya'll PLEASE can help me locate this photo from the Podesta e-mails we might have a chance to uncover what's hidden in this file!!
For anyone who's interested, this is how it looked when I scanned the photos. You will see that the photo in question is flagged as being encrypted with "jphide" steganography method: http://i.imgur.com/VtlG3My.jpg
God Bless!
view the rest of the comments →
LaDonnaRae ago
Forgive me, but you are missing something HUGE. I am VERY, VERY, VERY tired. I will run this down tomorrow, but you can do it sooner. The girl at 12:15 (maybe 12:30, depending upon your perception) is a girl who was trafficked out of Great Britain. She has been interviewed more than once. Check YouTube. Why in HELL is she in this photo with John Podesta? This is NOT Madeleine McCann, but she IS a trafficking victim. Run it down, and I will help tomorrow.
Mini-spare ago
New lead: This needs its own thread
Investigate1999 ago
No, it doesn't.
Theupsidedown ago
We are all ears if you'd like to provide an explanation as to why a separate topic from this post is not deserving of its own thread.
Investigate1999 ago
This all contributes to the same topic of this thread. Don't you think that the main page is already too cluttered?
Theupsidedown ago
Yes, but it is cluttered with crap.
These are two distinct leads: 1. A seemingly encrypted jpeg file that may be masking something incriminating 2. A photo of Podesta with a trafficking victim
They are two very different things. If someone could for instance establish a real connection between the victim and the podestas, that would be worthy of its own post, and if someone could unencrypt this jpeg that is worthy of its own post as well.
I'm not talking about a post that just says "OMG picture of Podesta with trafficking victim SMOKING GUN" and just links to the picture (and I don't think the other commenter to which you responded was suggesting that either).
A post that offers support to that idea with some research and corroborating pictures positively identifying the trafficking victim and creating a new line of further inquiry would be worthy of its own post, don't you think? Or do you think it would be better to have that whole idea buried in the comments section of a different post about a hidden file?
Two very distinguishably different topics.
newworldahead ago
What's the problem if the main page is "cluttered" with relevant topics?
Investigate1999 ago
I have no problems with relevant topics, but the irrelevant topics are a problem.