Honestly, you guys have beaten me down. All you do is remove everything. You say you want it all posted to other places nobody visits and all of that, but all you're actually doing is deleting information that I will never repost and now I don't even bother posting new information because I know you'll just find an excuse to take it down. Many people feel this way, not just me, so you're extensively harming the amount of good information this subreddit is now receiving. All of these posts you guys are removing of mine are posts with positive points, meaning other people are finding them useful.
The post in question can't be just child abuse. It has to explain why it is related to Pizzagate. All you did was say that it's a must read. The onus is on you to prove yourself and your content.
I explained this. It's not just about child abuse. It literally explains "multidimensional sex rings", the demographics behind the perpetrators/victims, how to define them, etc. Did you actually look at the content? The reason I use the term "child sexual victimization" is because that is all-inclusive, and we don't know what types of abuse #PizzaGate includes at this point. It may include "traditional sex rings" as well as the multidimensional sex rings. As the book explains, pedophiles tend to pass victims off to other pedophiles, which may be occurring here. It seems to me you deleted a post that many people upvoted and commented without even looking to see what the post was about.
I didn't look at the content. I didn't expect it to be about Pizzagate.
The rules state that I don't have to verify that it is about or not about Pizzagate. You have to prove it and explain the specific connection. Just being about sex and pedophiles and trading children doesn't count. You can read the definition of PIzzagate for yourself.
The rules state that we don't have to look at the content. You have to explain the connection to Pizzagate as defined to the subverse's standards. It's your responsibility.
You are welcome to repost the link with a full explanation. It has to be specific about Pizzagate, though.
People do go to the other sites. Trust the community.
I haven't been keeping track of who you are. If you have content to post, then let me know what it is. I'll help you to post it properly, so that it won't get deleted.
So, if one wanted to censor another without having the perception of censorship, they would tell the other to send their quality post to where there are 250 subs instead of 10,000'ish subs. I'm not a pawn to build your other sub.
Also, we don't need to subscribe to the other sub, because we just follow the links. There are probably more readers there than you might expect. It's not censorship.
Saying that deleting my posts and telling me to move them to a sub not viewed often isn't censorship is like telling me that having to protest the government in the back alley isn't censorship.
I wouldn't claim that it's the most important thing, but it's important that we speak the same language, and correcting you is okay. I'm not putting you down. It just helps to prevent misunderstanding.
view the rest of the comments →
Investigate1999 ago
This is a violation of Rule #1. Please move it to /v/pizzagatewhatever . It should be fine over there.
atheist4thecause ago
No. You deleted it so it's gone forever. Good job.
Investigate1999 ago
As mentioned in the other thread, you could copy and paste everything into the other forum.
atheist4thecause ago
Honestly, you guys have beaten me down. All you do is remove everything. You say you want it all posted to other places nobody visits and all of that, but all you're actually doing is deleting information that I will never repost and now I don't even bother posting new information because I know you'll just find an excuse to take it down. Many people feel this way, not just me, so you're extensively harming the amount of good information this subreddit is now receiving. All of these posts you guys are removing of mine are posts with positive points, meaning other people are finding them useful.
Investigate1999 ago
Oh, wait. I see who you are now.
The post in question can't be just child abuse. It has to explain why it is related to Pizzagate. All you did was say that it's a must read. The onus is on you to prove yourself and your content.
atheist4thecause ago
I explained this. It's not just about child abuse. It literally explains "multidimensional sex rings", the demographics behind the perpetrators/victims, how to define them, etc. Did you actually look at the content? The reason I use the term "child sexual victimization" is because that is all-inclusive, and we don't know what types of abuse #PizzaGate includes at this point. It may include "traditional sex rings" as well as the multidimensional sex rings. As the book explains, pedophiles tend to pass victims off to other pedophiles, which may be occurring here. It seems to me you deleted a post that many people upvoted and commented without even looking to see what the post was about.
Investigate1999 ago
I didn't look at the content. I didn't expect it to be about Pizzagate.
The rules state that I don't have to verify that it is about or not about Pizzagate. You have to prove it and explain the specific connection. Just being about sex and pedophiles and trading children doesn't count. You can read the definition of PIzzagate for yourself.
The other forums are for your topic.
Take it up with all of the other mods.
atheist4thecause ago
Why in the world are you deleting posts without looking at the content?
Investigate1999 ago
The rules state that we don't have to look at the content. You have to explain the connection to Pizzagate as defined to the subverse's standards. It's your responsibility.
You are welcome to repost the link with a full explanation. It has to be specific about Pizzagate, though.
Investigate1999 ago
People do go to the other sites. Trust the community.
I haven't been keeping track of who you are. If you have content to post, then let me know what it is. I'll help you to post it properly, so that it won't get deleted.
atheist4thecause ago
/r/pizzagatewhatever has 250 subs.
Investigate1999 ago
That's fine. I'm happy about that. Let's get more people to subscribe.
atheist4thecause ago
So, if one wanted to censor another without having the perception of censorship, they would tell the other to send their quality post to where there are 250 subs instead of 10,000'ish subs. I'm not a pawn to build your other sub.
Investigate1999 ago
You might do that, but I don't do that.
I don't own the other sub.
Also, we don't need to subscribe to the other sub, because we just follow the links. There are probably more readers there than you might expect. It's not censorship.
atheist4thecause ago
Saying that deleting my posts and telling me to move them to a sub not viewed often isn't censorship is like telling me that having to protest the government in the back alley isn't censorship.
Investigate1999 ago
This isn't protest. It's research.
atheist4thecause ago
People don't go into that thread, so I refuse to waste my time.
Investigate1999 ago
It's not a thread. It's a forum.
atheist4thecause ago
I'm glad we are getting down to the important aspects of the investigation here. I would argue the forum is Voat itself but w/e.
Investigate1999 ago
I wouldn't claim that it's the most important thing, but it's important that we speak the same language, and correcting you is okay. I'm not putting you down. It just helps to prevent misunderstanding.
Voat should be considered a site of forums.
atheist4thecause ago
If we really want to nail down the language, Voat is the Forum and each subverse (such as v/PizzaGate) is a sub-Forum. The posts are threads.