Anyone catch Tony and John Podesta discussing "Agency I" in emails? (pizzagate)
submitted 8.3 years ago by spaceanon
Has anyone researched the significance (or lack of) John and Tony Podesta discussing Jacob Studley and Julien Studley?
If taken literally, the sequence is:
"Julien Studley is very sick" and they discuss trying to help someone contact Jacob Studley. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/56699
In reply, John asks where is Jacob? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27373
to which Tony has two replies: (a) was in Beijing, then Pakistan, totally undercover https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32338, (b) then says "Agency I" https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44261
Some simple internet research reveals Jacob is probably Julien's son, which explains why they would want to contact him if his dad is very sick. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julien_J._Studley
The open questions I have are:
what is the Podesta brothers relationship to Jacob and Julien Studley?
what agency are they referring to when mentioning Agency I?
It seems clear whatever agency Jacob is associated with that has him undercover around the globe (hmmm..) is also an agency that both Tony and John have a close relationship with.
Anyhow, it seemed important to document this since I could not find any mentions in this sub-verse
view the rest of the comments →
Mrs_Ogynist01 8.3 years ago
Great find! Why does Tony Podesta have information on where undercover agents are located?
Verite1 8.3 years ago
To me, it would seem anyway, it would be because of all the CIA interaction with the Clinton foundation the revolving door, and how close the Podesta's are, insiders in Washington for so many years course they would have relationships, with CIA ppl.
throwawaa 8.3 years ago
Yup. And that's no doubt a violation of the law to share information about undercover agents with civilians.
view the rest of the comments →
Mrs_Ogynist01 ago
Great find! Why does Tony Podesta have information on where undercover agents are located?
Verite1 ago
To me, it would seem anyway, it would be because of all the CIA interaction with the Clinton foundation the revolving door, and how close the Podesta's are, insiders in Washington for so many years course they would have relationships, with CIA ppl.
throwawaa ago
Yup. And that's no doubt a violation of the law to share information about undercover agents with civilians.