Since this is a discussion post I'll alllow you to edit it but as it sits it is in violation of rule 1: ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
I very much so am but you have to demonstrate relevance to the pizzagate investigation otherwise this post is in violation of rule 1 and is more appropriate for /v/whereisassange.
view the rest of the comments →
gopluckyourself ago
Since this is a discussion post I'll alllow you to edit it but as it sits it is in violation of rule 1: ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
Hawtmess69 ago
Um pizza investigators are very interested in seeing proof of life ? Or are they not ?
gopluckyourself ago
I very much so am but you have to demonstrate relevance to the pizzagate investigation otherwise this post is in violation of rule 1 and is more appropriate for /v/whereisassange.
Hawtmess69 ago
Point taken . Thanks I guess I'll go over there.
gopluckyourself ago
also from your other post this is the announcement link that will take you straight to the article you were talking about http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/31/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-hacking.html