You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

OTPROPHET ago

So no proof huh? Simple question. I guess you could prove the world that you're not a hyperbolic idiot and post some. Anyway, you're not helping, you realize that?

Fateswebb ago

So what you're saying is if there is initially no proof of a persons claims that you should not investigate. The fact is Cathy does have a lot of facts that fit other claims of the same thing. Sure there is no smoking gun here, however to ignore it would be very short sighted. The fact is her claims are exactly what this investigation are about and they predate it, that in it self adds a bit of credibility to her story. But ignoring it and calling it fake without proof is even more dangerous than accepting that she makes the claim and that it could be real.