the above user is a known alt of the division shill webofslime
i deleted a rule breaking post by this user's main. it got sooo butthurt it went adhdferret and went screaming around all sorts of silly nonsense. no sources no proof of a single claim.
here above, another call to action against me for perceived slights when in reality i did nothing except delete a clear rule breaking post (no linking to google. linked to google. wouldn't repost.)
I am curious about the rule no linking to google. Is that just because we want the article source or something? What is the thought process behind the rule?
on v/clintongate a private sub i created to post things specific to investigating JUST clintons?
no links to known censoring sites.
that's the rule, really. oogle's just one of 'em. twatter facebook, instaham, imgur, and many many many fucking more.
do the op work and archive.
user wouldn't repost with archive even. FINALLY commented with the archive but that's not the rule.
the spirit is that it makes no sense to drive traffic to censorship sites when having to also fight being censored trying to simply find the truth.
fucking silly to do so.
whatever rest of voat can post fucking imgur links and even to fatpeople hate a sub that was entirely censored off imgur with no warning, but people still post to imgur on fph w/e.
i yell about it sometimes as being highly hypocritical and disingenouous at best.
(look a fucking mod that takes the time to talk to fucking everyone possible because this site is for DISCUSSION omg!)
i just got banned for pointing out the mod was selectively enforcing comment deleting rules in a private sub and got banned for hurting the mod's fee fees.
so yeah. fuck censors like @lockeproposal the ACTUAL mod found to be reddit cancer yesterday (but was slid out of view by the massive 1400 downoat800 comment 20 post character assassination attempt on me in the last 30 hours. (not to mention bait posts in v/til)
view the rest of the comments →
SaneGoatiSwear ago
relevant username like a motherfucker.
lol knot
one question
is the law real?
does it actually mean that (besides the dyncorp shit)
?!
help me out here
followthemoney ago
This person and their alts should be banned. @kevdude
SaneGoatiSwear ago
the above user is a known alt of the division shill webofslime
i deleted a rule breaking post by this user's main. it got sooo butthurt it went adhdferret and went screaming around all sorts of silly nonsense. no sources no proof of a single claim.
here above, another call to action against me for perceived slights when in reality i did nothing except delete a clear rule breaking post (no linking to google. linked to google. wouldn't repost.)
Fateswebb ago
I am curious about the rule no linking to google. Is that just because we want the article source or something? What is the thought process behind the rule?
SaneGoatiSwear ago
on v/clintongate a private sub i created to post things specific to investigating JUST clintons?
no links to known censoring sites.
that's the rule, really. oogle's just one of 'em. twatter facebook, instaham, imgur, and many many many fucking more.
do the op work and archive.
user wouldn't repost with archive even. FINALLY commented with the archive but that's not the rule.
the spirit is that it makes no sense to drive traffic to censorship sites when having to also fight being censored trying to simply find the truth.
fucking silly to do so.
whatever rest of voat can post fucking imgur links and even to fatpeople hate a sub that was entirely censored off imgur with no warning, but people still post to imgur on fph w/e.
i yell about it sometimes as being highly hypocritical and disingenouous at best.
(look a fucking mod that takes the time to talk to fucking everyone possible because this site is for DISCUSSION omg!)
i just got banned for pointing out the mod was selectively enforcing comment deleting rules in a private sub and got banned for hurting the mod's fee fees.
so yeah. fuck censors like @lockeproposal the ACTUAL mod found to be reddit cancer yesterday (but was slid out of view by the massive 1400 downoat800 comment 20 post character assassination attempt on me in the last 30 hours. (not to mention bait posts in v/til)
followthemoney ago
I'm not the only one has called you out. Given your inability to remain unemotional, I encourage everyone to consistently call this person out.
If you search the username, you will see that this person is an enemy of pizzagate and a nuisance to the vote community.
I recommend a permanent ban.