oh? pray reiterate your points, then we'll see who's giving up or not.
did you mean that circumstantial evidence isn't a subspecies of evidence?
or that circumstantial evidence isn't to be considered by a trier of fact?
or that circumstantial evidence isn't actual evidence, upon which investigations are initiated and built?
or that circumstantial evidence equals conjecture?
or that you're a windbag shill, farting knowledge that stinks upwind & downwind?
guess you'd rather keep everything hunkydory, business as usual, move along, nothing to see here, leave the inferences to the "pros" - all while the pedos in power skate...
go on, tho - serve up some more ad hominem attacks with a side of weakass projection, fart4brains.
view the rest of the comments →
sundalanded ago
oh? pray reiterate your points, then we'll see who's giving up or not.
did you mean that circumstantial evidence isn't a subspecies of evidence?
or that circumstantial evidence isn't to be considered by a trier of fact?
or that circumstantial evidence isn't actual evidence, upon which investigations are initiated and built?
or that circumstantial evidence equals conjecture?
or that you're a windbag shill, farting knowledge that stinks upwind & downwind?
guess you'd rather keep everything hunkydory, business as usual, move along, nothing to see here, leave the inferences to the "pros" - all while the pedos in power skate...
go on, tho - serve up some more ad hominem attacks with a side of weakass projection, fart4brains.