We need to figure out which one of us is familiar with Wikipedia policies. Editing something like the DynCorp page would best be done by someone with some reputation. The Wikipedia page could have more content added to it to reflect the story of the dancing boy and would force DynCorp to show their hand in more than one place, and maybe even pill Wikipedia users when they see DynCorp editing their page.
Myself and rules like Wikpedia's are entirely incompatible and I would never make an edit without some blowhard getting his weekly rage over formatting the talk page wrong in conjunction with the edit. We would want to execute this better than DynCorp. That's the point.
I agree with this point. As articulate and nicely written as many of the Wiki's pages are, someone with more of a voice at Wikipedia would be needed to move any content over. On a personal level, though, it probably won't be me either since I wish I could replace them myself.
view the rest of the comments →
bikergang_accountant ago
We need to figure out which one of us is familiar with Wikipedia policies. Editing something like the DynCorp page would best be done by someone with some reputation. The Wikipedia page could have more content added to it to reflect the story of the dancing boy and would force DynCorp to show their hand in more than one place, and maybe even pill Wikipedia users when they see DynCorp editing their page.
Myself and rules like Wikpedia's are entirely incompatible and I would never make an edit without some blowhard getting his weekly rage over formatting the talk page wrong in conjunction with the edit. We would want to execute this better than DynCorp. That's the point.
RebelSkum ago
I agree with this point. As articulate and nicely written as many of the Wiki's pages are, someone with more of a voice at Wikipedia would be needed to move any content over. On a personal level, though, it probably won't be me either since I wish I could replace them myself.