David seaman talks in certainties which I think is very dangerous. He says John podesta is a pedophile.
He also says that John podesta talks about pizza over and over again. This is actually blatantly untrue. Here is a search for pizza with the emails filtered by sender for John podesta. if you go through them you will see almost all of them the word pizza is in the copied text (the text he's responding to). The other times he is using it in a proper name like comet pizza or pizza hut. And only once does John podesta say the word pizza and that is when he is responding to someone else talking about pizza.
Keep in mind the podesta emails are in the thousands and span more than a decade. I would question David seaman's investigatory skills. People on here are not as quick to jump to conclusions as he is.
Edit: This comment is getting a lot of push back and I'm not sure why.
I think that people should understand that John Podesta almost never [*once] uses the word pizza in the 10 years worth of emails that are in the leaks. He also never says 'hot dog(s)' in the emails. The accusations being made are serious. The evidence that is put forward as proof for the accusation deserve a lot more scrutiny. Saying that "John Podesta uses known pedophile code language" and "he's using the phrases pizza and hot dogs to describe something inedible" and "he uses the phrase pizza over and over again", these things are blatantly untrue.
U should make a separate post about this. If someone says Podesta uses the terms and someone searches Wikileaks they'll actually believe it's fake as that'd be the logical jump when you're told it's fake and the first piece of info you look into is fake.
view the rest of the comments →
JUNOAK ago
David seaman talks in certainties which I think is very dangerous. He says John podesta is a pedophile.
He also says that John podesta talks about pizza over and over again. This is actually blatantly untrue. Here is a search for pizza with the emails filtered by sender for John podesta. if you go through them you will see almost all of them the word pizza is in the copied text (the text he's responding to). The other times he is using it in a proper name like comet pizza or pizza hut. And only once does John podesta say the word pizza and that is when he is responding to someone else talking about pizza.
Keep in mind the podesta emails are in the thousands and span more than a decade. I would question David seaman's investigatory skills. People on here are not as quick to jump to conclusions as he is.
Edit: This comment is getting a lot of push back and I'm not sure why.
I think that people should understand that John Podesta almost never [*once] uses the word pizza in the 10 years worth of emails that are in the leaks. He also never says 'hot dog(s)' in the emails. The accusations being made are serious. The evidence that is put forward as proof for the accusation deserve a lot more scrutiny. Saying that "John Podesta uses known pedophile code language" and "he's using the phrases pizza and hot dogs to describe something inedible" and "he uses the phrase pizza over and over again", these things are blatantly untrue.
Pizzainmyass ago
U should make a separate post about this. If someone says Podesta uses the terms and someone searches Wikileaks they'll actually believe it's fake as that'd be the logical jump when you're told it's fake and the first piece of info you look into is fake.
JUNOAK ago
Yea, I'll be making an individual post soonish about this and some of the other misconceptions about the code words.