Saudi was initiated by Kissinger in 1972 when USA went bankrupt, the only way Saudi's would accept non-gold for their oil was the promise of infinite white kids as sex-slave pets forever, now we're 40+ years into this,
Fuck it can't be investigated here, this is the source of the kids.
Prior to petro-dollar agreement in 1972 saudi's got GOLD for their OIL, they didn't want paper, Kissinger knew that in SAUDI slaves are more valuable than gold, and white slaves are the most coveted.
Yeah it should be investigated but it also needs to have evidence - how did you come to that conclusion that this started in 1972 etc, where did you get that info from? It should only be posted here if there is an explanation for why those conclusions have been reached, and links that show how the investigator found out about it. When a post simply states things as you have here, well, anyone can state anything about anything, it doesn't mean it is true! That's why those ones get deleted. If they presented a coherent argument and included sources to back up their claims it would be totally different.
view the rest of the comments →
kingkongasshole ago
Saudi was initiated by Kissinger in 1972 when USA went bankrupt, the only way Saudi's would accept non-gold for their oil was the promise of infinite white kids as sex-slave pets forever, now we're 40+ years into this,
Fuck it can't be investigated here, this is the source of the kids.
Prior to petro-dollar agreement in 1972 saudi's got GOLD for their OIL, they didn't want paper, Kissinger knew that in SAUDI slaves are more valuable than gold, and white slaves are the most coveted.
SpikyAube ago
Yeah it should be investigated but it also needs to have evidence - how did you come to that conclusion that this started in 1972 etc, where did you get that info from? It should only be posted here if there is an explanation for why those conclusions have been reached, and links that show how the investigator found out about it. When a post simply states things as you have here, well, anyone can state anything about anything, it doesn't mean it is true! That's why those ones get deleted. If they presented a coherent argument and included sources to back up their claims it would be totally different.