That is an unsubstantiated statement.
IMO it is far more likely that Ms Nijenhuis made up everything.
She is also into alternative healing.
Until there are verdict her claims should be taken as disinformation.
So you think that 2:30h interview was a fake and the one with Anne Marie van Blijenburgh as well? I have to say one does look pretty traumatized, to other one not at all.
What's wrong with being into alternative healing?
Yes, I think the interview was a fake. Extreme claims but no real evidence; that makes it unlikely. Her traumatized look may well have a different cause. Worse, of two popes would kill children they would be sure that there would be no surviving witnesses. And alternative healing is also unsubstantiated because it is alternative: substantiated healing is the regular stuff, by definition.
The testimonies of Nijenhuis are highly unreliable; please stop posting that stuff here; it harms this Voat subverse.
Keep in mind that testimonies about satanic rituals will always result in extreme claims. Secondly, they weren't popes yet at the time of the supposed crimes. Anyway, I'll keep this one open.
view the rest of the comments →
idontlikesalmon ago
You can look up the testimonies of the dutch woman Toos Nijenhuis. She was a victim of satanic rituals and saw the last two popes kill children.
andrevandelft ago
That is an unsubstantiated statement. IMO it is far more likely that Ms Nijenhuis made up everything. She is also into alternative healing. Until there are verdict her claims should be taken as disinformation.
idontlikesalmon ago
So you think that 2:30h interview was a fake and the one with Anne Marie van Blijenburgh as well? I have to say one does look pretty traumatized, to other one not at all. What's wrong with being into alternative healing?
andrevandelft ago
Yes, I think the interview was a fake. Extreme claims but no real evidence; that makes it unlikely. Her traumatized look may well have a different cause. Worse, of two popes would kill children they would be sure that there would be no surviving witnesses. And alternative healing is also unsubstantiated because it is alternative: substantiated healing is the regular stuff, by definition.
The testimonies of Nijenhuis are highly unreliable; please stop posting that stuff here; it harms this Voat subverse.
idontlikesalmon ago
Keep in mind that testimonies about satanic rituals will always result in extreme claims. Secondly, they weren't popes yet at the time of the supposed crimes. Anyway, I'll keep this one open.