You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

yousef1971 ago

wow now we have evidence that perverts can be perverts!

Millennial_Falcon ago

Associating us with homophobia destroys our credibility. It's a "divide-and-conquer" tactic. Also, this doesn't seem to have been an elite pedo ring, let alone connected to the Clinton Foundation, so it's not that relevant to pizzagate.

yousef1971 ago

you are so blind and brainwashed, sodomizing-sadism-pedophilia are one holy trinity. it's not a surprise that sodomites (alefantis, possibly obama) are at the center of this issue.

Orange_Circle ago

There isn't any such thing as "homophobia."

Millennial_Falcon ago

There definitely is. Or call it anti-gay bigotry. If your antagonism towards homosexuality is based on the Old Testament, I've got a few other passage from the Old Testament I'd like to hear your views on. Being anti-gay is quite anti-Christian IMO. Judge not, lest ye be judged.

Orange_Circle ago

Judge not, lest ye be judged.

"But he that is spiritual judgeth all things"

1 Corinthians 2:15

Orange_Circle ago

The Old Testament isn't Christianity, correct?

Millennial_Falcon ago

Do you believe people who have premarital sex or eat shrimp should be put to death?

DooDooDoodle ago

It's not homophobia to point out that homosexuals are over overrepresented in child sex offenses. Individuals from the 1 percent to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children. That is significant.

A study in the Journal of Sex Research found that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.

It's not homophobic to notice gay men are overrepresented any more than its "anti-male" or "male phobic" to point out men are overrepresented among child molesters. I don't think we should ignore connections just because they are politically incorrect.

Millennial_Falcon ago

homosexuals are over overrepresented in child sex offenses

source?

DooDooDoodle ago

If you don't believe me about the political bias of social science just google "social science liberal bias" and there are numerous articles outlining the issue.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-social-science-politically-biased/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fixing-the-problem-of-liberal-bias-in-social-psychology/

feel_the_bern_baby ago

Homophobe!

DooDooDoodle ago

Themisuse here is two fold, first gay activist often claim that research is flawed because male on male abuse isn't necessarily homosexual. Second, social science is incredibly left leaning, so much so that it has been critiqued for using political bias to guide research and decide what gets studied. There is not a lot of support for researching this topic these days so much of the data is from the 80sband early 90s which then gets dismissed as being out of date.

This report has many sources for their claims, but again the are old because there just isn't interest in researching the topic due to PC. I'm not saying all homosexuals are pedophiles, merely that for their population size 2-3% they are overrepresented.

https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3

http://www.wnd.com/2002/04/13722/

Millennial_Falcon ago

FRC is a biased source.

"are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children."

That's deceptive language. It could mean 0% and it could mean 33%, or anywhere in between. They also provided no source to back the "up to 1/3" number. Also, their number for the rate of homosexuality (1-3%) is questionably low. The percentage of people who have had some degree of same-sex sexual contact is much higher than that.

DooDooDoodle ago

Why are their biases any worse than the overwhelming bias of the social science industry? There is no doubt that heterosexual men commit more child abuse but the issue is the amount homosexuals commit based on being on 2-3% of the population.


“Overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture,” wrote Steve Baldwin in, “Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement,” soon to be published by the Regent University Law Review.

Baldwin is the executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington, D.C.

“It is difficult to convey the dark side of the homosexual culture without appearing harsh,” wrote Baldwin. “However, it is time to acknowledge that homosexual behavior threatens the foundation of Western civilization – the nuclear family.” Though the homosexual community and much of the media scoff at such accusations, Baldwin – who chaired the California Assembly’s Education committee, where he fought against support for the homosexual agenda in the state’s public schools – says in his report that homosexual activists’ “efforts to target children both for their own sexual pleasure and to enlarge the homosexual movement” constitute an “unmistakable” attack on “the family unit.”

Baldwin’s research is substantiated in a recently completed body of work written by Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education and author of numerous authoritative books debunking sexual myths, including “Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.”

In her thesis – also written for the Regent University Law Review – Reisman cited psychologist Eugene Abel, whose research found that homosexuals “sexually molest young boys with an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls. …”

Abel also found that non-incarcerated “child molesters admitted from 23.4 to 281.7 acts per offender … whose targets were males.”

“The rate of homosexual versus heterosexual child sexual abuse is staggering,” said Reisman, who was the principal investigator for an $800,000 Justice Department grant studying child pornography and violence. “Abel’s data of 150.2 boys abused per male homosexual offender finds no equal (yet) in heterosexual violations of 19.8 girls.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2002/04/13722/#Su0Ohk2AZArKFihP.99