You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VieBleu ago

Hate to be a hater on them, but to me, even their name is creepy - "One of Us". You know one of us people that have our preferences.

these "artists" strike me as the type that do it as hangers on because its trendy to them. They are promoted to serve as the "real people" artists that will be outraged at any criticism of child sized coffins, debasing children etc. They have no inkling of what the art actually serves to do for the East Coast Establishment.

EVERYONE needs to be familiar with the way the CIA has for decades intentionally directed art in order to shape societal norms and ideas http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html
MODERN ART WAS A CIA COLD WAR WEAPON. Incredible, but true. And they put a CIA friendly journalist or cultural reporter at almost every press desk in every mid sized town in America, I kid you not. There is no reason to think they don't do so today, and in fact we see the results clearly of a totally infiltrated media on every level.
If anyone tells you that art doesn't matter, they are uneducated. Art bypasses critical thinking areas of the brain and directly stimulates the unconscious mind. And that's just for starters.

ALDO_NOVA ago

my feeling is a lot of the artists are ex-victims, mkultra controlled, they are put out into the world broken, and use art and laudering as a way to make money,

works like this: make shit art - have gallery "sell" to launderer/enabler for $10k, give back $8k, keep $2k - resell, keep or destroy art - repeat

at same time, make art that conveys subliminal/overt messages to promote a pedo/occult agenda

how else do explain this "art" ?

VieBleu ago

good points - especially about the gallery/laundering operations for terrible/disturbing/messaging art. Prob gets the artists dependent on the controller gallery as well.