Wow I can't believe I actually read that whole thing. Thanks for posting. I like the author's take on Trump being an "accidental" president. Just really think about that. The globalists had an accident happen. Like a game of Chess, where it's the globalists vs the people. They were looking for the checkmate when Hillary got elected. They were SO close. Their pieces were all moving into place. But as fate would have it, an accident of epic proportions occurred, and the people were given like 3 free moves. Trump gets elected, Wikileaks spreads massive truths, and alt-media becomes the more trusted source of information. Their sure victory now sits much further distance. This letter makes some well thought out cases as to where Trump should move his next pieces, to move that victory even further out.
it wasn't an accident. hillary was a terrible candidate. Anybody picked randomly from the phone book would have beat trump, but she had to be the one. She cheated against Bernie, the leaks happened, the lynch plane incident, the health issues, the comey letters, none of that was accidental...Anybody picked randomly out of the phone book could have beat Hillary, if the primary wasn't rigged, we'd have Bernie.
Yes HIllary was a bad candidate, absolutely. The accident though was this: by bucking the two party system which is in effect what Trump and the people did, an anomaly was allowed in the system. Something that shouldn't be.
He ran republican, but how much rep support did he really have? The 2-party system is really two sides of the same coin, right? The outsider/outlier prevailed. He snuck in as republican, but as a rino as far as its ties to the RNC go. How could the powers that be allow their position of "queen" to be captured, which is what the position of a POTUS could be likened to in a global game of chess.
This guy in the paper posted by OP has a good explanation for the phenomenon. For those who didn't read, he suggests Trump quickly change the electoral process to ensure 3rd party candidates have any kind of chance in the future. The current system is set up to preserve and protect the 2-party system, which is why nothing ever changes.
I don't think this guy is ex cia. I didn't read his whole letter, but it started out sounding like a manic rant, that i couldn't take it seriously. But also, the podsta emails show that the H campaign was asking MSM to push trump over the RNC-appoved candidates, so Trump didn't just sneak in, Hill wasn't going to beat any of the others, she needed Trump to knock them out. She didn't count on being less acceptable to voters than Trump. I don't see it as an accident, (its the word accident that i object to) I see it as super pisspoor bad judgment and being such a bad candidate that she deserved to lose. Those who had been gaming the system underestimated their ability to manipulate the vote.
view the rest of the comments →
bigDanold ago
Wow I can't believe I actually read that whole thing. Thanks for posting. I like the author's take on Trump being an "accidental" president. Just really think about that. The globalists had an accident happen. Like a game of Chess, where it's the globalists vs the people. They were looking for the checkmate when Hillary got elected. They were SO close. Their pieces were all moving into place. But as fate would have it, an accident of epic proportions occurred, and the people were given like 3 free moves. Trump gets elected, Wikileaks spreads massive truths, and alt-media becomes the more trusted source of information. Their sure victory now sits much further distance. This letter makes some well thought out cases as to where Trump should move his next pieces, to move that victory even further out.
2impendingdoom ago
it wasn't an accident. hillary was a terrible candidate. Anybody picked randomly from the phone book would have beat trump, but she had to be the one. She cheated against Bernie, the leaks happened, the lynch plane incident, the health issues, the comey letters, none of that was accidental...Anybody picked randomly out of the phone book could have beat Hillary, if the primary wasn't rigged, we'd have Bernie.
bigDanold ago
Yes HIllary was a bad candidate, absolutely. The accident though was this: by bucking the two party system which is in effect what Trump and the people did, an anomaly was allowed in the system. Something that shouldn't be.
He ran republican, but how much rep support did he really have? The 2-party system is really two sides of the same coin, right? The outsider/outlier prevailed. He snuck in as republican, but as a rino as far as its ties to the RNC go. How could the powers that be allow their position of "queen" to be captured, which is what the position of a POTUS could be likened to in a global game of chess.
This guy in the paper posted by OP has a good explanation for the phenomenon. For those who didn't read, he suggests Trump quickly change the electoral process to ensure 3rd party candidates have any kind of chance in the future. The current system is set up to preserve and protect the 2-party system, which is why nothing ever changes.
2impendingdoom ago
I don't think this guy is ex cia. I didn't read his whole letter, but it started out sounding like a manic rant, that i couldn't take it seriously. But also, the podsta emails show that the H campaign was asking MSM to push trump over the RNC-appoved candidates, so Trump didn't just sneak in, Hill wasn't going to beat any of the others, she needed Trump to knock them out. She didn't count on being less acceptable to voters than Trump. I don't see it as an accident, (its the word accident that i object to) I see it as super pisspoor bad judgment and being such a bad candidate that she deserved to lose. Those who had been gaming the system underestimated their ability to manipulate the vote.