It doesn't mean they've done anything. You have to submit evidence. Yes, it can be circumstantial, but it has to be of a crime. It can't be an overreaching arc like, HRC AND PODESTA AND CP ARE ALL WORKING TOGETHER TO MOLEST CHILDREN! While some may conclude this, the justice department/police just isn't going to go after someone based on a theory. That's why you target someone ... the person that you think will be: (1) the weakest and most vulnerable link; (2) the one you have the strongest evidence against; and (3) someone in a position where it would matter if they shared or talked about child molestation/pedophilia. That boils down to one person of the individuals we know. Otherwise, this is going to go nowhere on its own. I'm not saying this is a waste of time -- it isn't. I'm also not saying that people haven't done brilliant jobs in uncovering evidence because they have. We now have to compile it against the one that meets the above criteria. Otherwise, we continue doing what we're doing and hope what is on Wiener's computer is enough to spur charges. Since we don't know what's on there, or who else was involved in it (because if it's that perv working alone, we're screwed), it's a gamble and might leave us at the spot we are right now.
Why the fuck are you talking to me, shill? All I said is that there is a group of people who think her murder suicide was shady and is all over the investigation of the Podesta emails. Wtf is your problem?
What? No reason to get upset. I meant nothing by it. There were other conversations referencing what was needed to bring an indictment. I thought this was part of that continuing conversation. Obviously, from your reaction, I understand that it wasn't. You were just posting to let people know there was a FB page. Sorry it was taken that way.
view the rest of the comments →
Malignment ago
I wonder if someone could contact her children
quantokitty ago
For what purpose? I don't want fifty million people harassing them.
DcFunny ago
There is a Facebook group called "We demand an extensive investigation... [long-ass name]" and it's been around for years and is all over pizza gate.
quantokitty ago
It doesn't mean they've done anything. You have to submit evidence. Yes, it can be circumstantial, but it has to be of a crime. It can't be an overreaching arc like, HRC AND PODESTA AND CP ARE ALL WORKING TOGETHER TO MOLEST CHILDREN! While some may conclude this, the justice department/police just isn't going to go after someone based on a theory. That's why you target someone ... the person that you think will be: (1) the weakest and most vulnerable link; (2) the one you have the strongest evidence against; and (3) someone in a position where it would matter if they shared or talked about child molestation/pedophilia. That boils down to one person of the individuals we know. Otherwise, this is going to go nowhere on its own. I'm not saying this is a waste of time -- it isn't. I'm also not saying that people haven't done brilliant jobs in uncovering evidence because they have. We now have to compile it against the one that meets the above criteria. Otherwise, we continue doing what we're doing and hope what is on Wiener's computer is enough to spur charges. Since we don't know what's on there, or who else was involved in it (because if it's that perv working alone, we're screwed), it's a gamble and might leave us at the spot we are right now.
DcFunny ago
Why the fuck are you talking to me, shill? All I said is that there is a group of people who think her murder suicide was shady and is all over the investigation of the Podesta emails. Wtf is your problem?
quantokitty ago
What? No reason to get upset. I meant nothing by it. There were other conversations referencing what was needed to bring an indictment. I thought this was part of that continuing conversation. Obviously, from your reaction, I understand that it wasn't. You were just posting to let people know there was a FB page. Sorry it was taken that way.