Some sure, but also only some dems. The Clintons are a criminal gang. All politicians might be in some gang but they all are definately not a part of the same gang. Clinton's gang is very specific to human trafficing and some republican might be helping some small business embezzle money in his own gang.
Sometimes a republican ends up in a pedo gang but I do think it is a different group within the same industry. Clinton's group is too tight knit to let everyone in.
No one has implicated Bernie in this specific pizzagate issue. Not everyone is in it.
Politicians are criminals in general but I don't think there has been any as dangerous or disgusting as Clinton. Do we have any example of an elected or appointed official using war as a cover for human trafficing, the way it is suspected in Libya and Syria? I've never even heard even an implication for anyone else in all the corrupt mistakes we've seen in the past. Hillary is an angel of death while others are just corrupt people sometimes with sick flaws and can sometimes make poor calculations about the value of human life. Hillary is a step above. There's no case for even Franklin using war or selling stolen body parts like there is a case for Hillary. This Clinton - Podesta - Blumenthal group is hell on Earth.
Oh yeah I completely agree they are hell on earth and the most despicable inhuman monsters that have ever lived. But I suspect that the tendrils of their evil reach far and wide among political elites. I believe that UK politicians (not all of them) are very much involved in this kind of thing. I expect that the Bush family are very connected into it as well - the Bushes and Clintons seem to get on well and set up all kinds of foundations and initiatives together. I suspect that there is a group of disgustingly evil people that have infiltrated many parts of government at all levels in many countries, and those people will make sure they have some of their number on both sides of the political spectrum. And high up in corporations, too. We can't forget about the corporations, who are engaged with government in a back-scratching exercise that leaves the rest of us covered in their filthy poisonous diseased skin flakes.
But of course not everyone is part of it even at high levels, although I suspect many know about it or suspect, but are too frightened to do anything about it, or just pretend to themselves that they don't know. I think most of the media probably just don't believe it and that's why they report as they do, not that it's a big deliberate cover up - these journalists these days are all in their jobs due to nepotism and being lazy and not employed for things like journalistic integrity or investigative skills. They are in a big bubble in which they truly believe that PG is just a bunch of crazy racist fascist alt-right nut jobs. I was in that bubble for a bit, but I love finding out why other people think differently than I do, so that's how I discovered that it was all true. These people don't delve into anything or see for themselves, they just believe whatever some colleague they think has cool hair told them.
To be fair, it might be better than the kid having no abortions and 7 children. Or doing the abortions with a coat hanger. I do think the doctors should should keep an eye open for abuse though.
But why those specific policies? A 16 year old can't attend a history class without their being some record of it. If any aspect of the policy were adjusted in any dimension it would have a substancial impact on human trafficing but now the law facilitates them to that industries exact need.
Also in terms of the sanctity of life I disagree. I'm not saying that to start a different discussion but I just have to be open on where I stand. But don't you think that the expectation that abortions being anonymous even from police is a little extreme to claim as a rights issue when the same party says you can't have a soda of a certain size and is all for tracking other people?
This is just a matter of compiling information that has investigative utility. Payment could be a data point. The person going in could be a data point.
Because cultural authoritarians have appropriated the label "liberal," and the people here do not like subversive cultural authoritarians. Liberal ≠ cultural authoritarian, which is why some people use the label "classically liberal" to distinguish themselves from this nonsense.
view the rest of the comments →
bikergang_accountant ago
Now we know why dems want free abortions, with no records, and available to minors.
WITLESS ago
What becomes of the body parts is whats concerning.
SpikyAube ago
Well Republicans are part of this whole thing too.
bikergang_accountant ago
Some sure, but also only some dems. The Clintons are a criminal gang. All politicians might be in some gang but they all are definately not a part of the same gang. Clinton's gang is very specific to human trafficing and some republican might be helping some small business embezzle money in his own gang.
Sometimes a republican ends up in a pedo gang but I do think it is a different group within the same industry. Clinton's group is too tight knit to let everyone in.
No one has implicated Bernie in this specific pizzagate issue. Not everyone is in it.
Politicians are criminals in general but I don't think there has been any as dangerous or disgusting as Clinton. Do we have any example of an elected or appointed official using war as a cover for human trafficing, the way it is suspected in Libya and Syria? I've never even heard even an implication for anyone else in all the corrupt mistakes we've seen in the past. Hillary is an angel of death while others are just corrupt people sometimes with sick flaws and can sometimes make poor calculations about the value of human life. Hillary is a step above. There's no case for even Franklin using war or selling stolen body parts like there is a case for Hillary. This Clinton - Podesta - Blumenthal group is hell on Earth.
SpikyAube ago
Oh yeah I completely agree they are hell on earth and the most despicable inhuman monsters that have ever lived. But I suspect that the tendrils of their evil reach far and wide among political elites. I believe that UK politicians (not all of them) are very much involved in this kind of thing. I expect that the Bush family are very connected into it as well - the Bushes and Clintons seem to get on well and set up all kinds of foundations and initiatives together. I suspect that there is a group of disgustingly evil people that have infiltrated many parts of government at all levels in many countries, and those people will make sure they have some of their number on both sides of the political spectrum. And high up in corporations, too. We can't forget about the corporations, who are engaged with government in a back-scratching exercise that leaves the rest of us covered in their filthy poisonous diseased skin flakes.
But of course not everyone is part of it even at high levels, although I suspect many know about it or suspect, but are too frightened to do anything about it, or just pretend to themselves that they don't know. I think most of the media probably just don't believe it and that's why they report as they do, not that it's a big deliberate cover up - these journalists these days are all in their jobs due to nepotism and being lazy and not employed for things like journalistic integrity or investigative skills. They are in a big bubble in which they truly believe that PG is just a bunch of crazy racist fascist alt-right nut jobs. I was in that bubble for a bit, but I love finding out why other people think differently than I do, so that's how I discovered that it was all true. These people don't delve into anything or see for themselves, they just believe whatever some colleague they think has cool hair told them.
The_Invincible_Moose ago
Nah, they promise that they're anti-abortion every election cycle.
WITLESS ago
They are just appealling to the christian lobby on that behavior.
Wattersun ago
okay, but then they vote for it. So even if its just to appeal to one group, its still being voted for
LargePepperoni ago
To be fair, it might be better than the kid having no abortions and 7 children. Or doing the abortions with a coat hanger. I do think the doctors should should keep an eye open for abuse though.
bikergang_accountant ago
But why those specific policies? A 16 year old can't attend a history class without their being some record of it. If any aspect of the policy were adjusted in any dimension it would have a substancial impact on human trafficing but now the law facilitates them to that industries exact need.
Also in terms of the sanctity of life I disagree. I'm not saying that to start a different discussion but I just have to be open on where I stand. But don't you think that the expectation that abortions being anonymous even from police is a little extreme to claim as a rights issue when the same party says you can't have a soda of a certain size and is all for tracking other people?
This is just a matter of compiling information that has investigative utility. Payment could be a data point. The person going in could be a data point.
LargePepperoni ago
Both solutions have pros and cons. Studies would be needed to find out what is best. Some studies may already exist. I don't know much about it.
TheKFCNyanCat ago
I seriously don't know why "liberal = evil" is so common here. Remember: liberal =/= democrat, and Republicans are involved too.
movebackward ago
Because cultural authoritarians have appropriated the label "liberal," and the people here do not like subversive cultural authoritarians. Liberal ≠ cultural authoritarian, which is why some people use the label "classically liberal" to distinguish themselves from this nonsense.