Since the RICO Act, for these people to be convicted we don't even have to prove they committed a specific crime, just that they associated with groups who do:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act
This means if we catch one of them, we catch them all.
Diversify your options beyond the main figures, connect these people, use their social media and the leaked emails to create a web of acquaintances and shared social events. Like any other organization, there is a hierarchy.
The higher-ups will have their tracks well covered by collaborators but it's logistically impossible to cover up for all of the organization's lackeys and various associates, including the shills reading this.
Start from the bottom up, connect several of those individuals to the same main figures from multiple angles and you will collect enough circumstantial evidence to prove association. Think of the randos we found who have pictures with HRC, Podesta and the others, also the daycare network, look into their past and check if they have a criminal record.
Then you can fry the shills, connect them to actual crimes. There could be hundreds or even thousands of people involved and most will be dumb enough or reckless enough to leave a trace.
If you're one of the shills, be warned we're coming after you people first. You are the weak element, they might even feed you to the angry mobs as a way to deflect responsibility, it's the rational thing to do, unless you come out and bargain for your life while you still can.
view the rest of the comments →
Investigate1999 ago
You can punish the shills, if you can access them. That's cool, but how would you access them? I was under the impression that they are CIA agents, that specialize in spreading hate on the web. I was so sure that they are professionals on payroll, who have their identities protected.
RecycledUser ago
My first reaction to the idea of punishing the shills first, was if we have enough evidence of actual players, we don't want to lose them unnecessarily, or give them warning or a chance to cover their tracks. And just in case the shills are given marching orders only, with no direct communication upward on purpose? I saw on here a thread a day or two ago, noting the first guy to get fired in the Project Veritas videos hadn't been seen lately... The Foley guy.
Investigate1999 ago
I don't understand what you mean.
What do you mean by "lose them unnecessarily"?
What is the significance of the Foley guy?
RecycledUser ago
I meant if they somehow can wipe all evidence of them being in the link to JA or CF.
On Foley, I'm not sure if he's also involved in PG or just illegal voting. But his boss, Robert Creamer and, married to a sitting congresswoman, had direct contact with O and HC, and the fact of Foley MIA was mentioned on here last week. Other than that, I'll have to look it up, I forgot, sorry.
Investigate1999 ago
That sounds great. Keep up the good work!