Remember, we have good evidence that the government does a lot of different illegal and clandestine activities. So, as you're looking at terms, don't assume everything is child abuse. Other common activities include drug running, arms sales, and even sale of state secrets and intel.
For example, the e-mail about getting cheese instead of pasta in a package, and talking about playing dominos on cheese, etc. It could be literally a human being in a package. But it could be drugs, legal age prostitutes, etc.
The e-mail about the $65,000 hot dog party also could be referring to drugs. I immediately thought of this:
http://s706.photobucket.com/user/tyrone-biggums/media/TyroneCrackParty2.jpg.html
view the rest of the comments →
cosmicmind ago
upvote for you. I'd give you a hundred if I could. This is exactly what I thought. Clinton was already known for drugs, and that never caused a wave.
Donald Trump's pre-election roast 25 second blurb about the Clintons taking a number of Haitian villages. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMJoNl2RHIU
With Podesta as Obama and Clintons adviser I'd find it very hard to believe that Obama was blind and stupid to all this.... and for reasons you've mentioned I doubt they'd be using more commonly known pedo names for drugs. It'd be better for them to use drug names rather than pedo names, for obvious reasons... drugs in the whitehouse would be easier to take than pedo's in the whitehouse. No, I doubt they'd want to incriminate themselves as pedo's if it were drugs.
But if they're pedo's then that's their not really trying to hide what/who they are.
Look at podesta brothers, neither tried to hide who/what they were (pictures).