More signal noise.... I can't find the "purple revolution" video this is some more random bs completely unrelated to pizza gate please remove your submission.
MOOOOOOODDDDS /u/kingkongwaswrong/u/Melitica/u/Crensch/u/numbchuck/u/KnowThyself/u/heygeorge/u/VictorSteinerDavion/u/Phobos_Mothership/u/Millennial_Falcon/u/RedGreenAlliance 2. Posts not about PIZZAGATE specifically will be removed. 3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
I was speaking about the subject the op was presenting, not the shoddy way they presented it, my mention of archetypes backs that up. I agree with you that we have to be more vigilant with our sources though.
view the rest of the comments →
gopluckyourself ago
More signal noise.... I can't find the "purple revolution" video this is some more random bs completely unrelated to pizza gate please remove your submission.
MOOOOOOODDDDS /u/kingkongwaswrong /u/Melitica /u/Crensch /u/numbchuck /u/KnowThyself /u/heygeorge /u/VictorSteinerDavion /u/Phobos_Mothership /u/Millennial_Falcon /u/RedGreenAlliance 2. Posts not about PIZZAGATE specifically will be removed. 3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
eyeVoated ago
How is this not potentially related to our investigation?
Crensch ago
In the sense that literally anything could be "potentially" related to our investigation?
postfascion ago
It is all linked, and related to archetypes.
Crensch ago
No, it's really not. Nothing was presented as being linked. Not a single line of text in the title or discussion area made that link clear.
"Related to archetypes" is not a valid argument to link the OP in a way that makes it passable as a submission here.
postfascion ago
I was speaking about the subject the op was presenting, not the shoddy way they presented it, my mention of archetypes backs that up. I agree with you that we have to be more vigilant with our sources though.