DYNAMITE! - that court order looks legit, doesnt it?
Any lawyers on site, what are they referring to in the Conclusion 'right to unseal'
does that effectively mean there's no obstruction in them exposing/examining the emails on the laptop?
This judge has really kicked Clinton in the Cankle:
" the judge determined Clinton essentially waived her privacy right arguments that the uncharged subject of an investigation typically can rely on.
In the words of the judge, Clinton has “little remaining privacy interest in the release of documents identifying her as the subject of the investigation.”"
You're missing the point. This warrant has already been executed. The emails were reviewed and the case was closed a second time.
This is only about the warrant itself. Right to unseal is to unseal the warrant. And the bit about Clinton's privacy rights seems to be aimed at the FBI who were trying to keep this warrant sealed.
The guy who brought the case to unseal the warrant was arguing and still argues today that there is no probable cause here.
view the rest of the comments →
MolochHunter ago
DYNAMITE! - that court order looks legit, doesnt it? Any lawyers on site, what are they referring to in the Conclusion 'right to unseal' does that effectively mean there's no obstruction in them exposing/examining the emails on the laptop?
This judge has really kicked Clinton in the Cankle: " the judge determined Clinton essentially waived her privacy right arguments that the uncharged subject of an investigation typically can rely on. In the words of the judge, Clinton has “little remaining privacy interest in the release of documents identifying her as the subject of the investigation.”"
AreWeSure ago
You're missing the point. This warrant has already been executed. The emails were reviewed and the case was closed a second time.
This is only about the warrant itself. Right to unseal is to unseal the warrant. And the bit about Clinton's privacy rights seems to be aimed at the FBI who were trying to keep this warrant sealed.
The guy who brought the case to unseal the warrant was arguing and still argues today that there is no probable cause here.
srayzie ago
Cankle lol. I hope this is legit!