You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wecanhelp ago

I'm late to the party but here's my tl;dr two cents:

  • Enforce a strict checklist for submissions to make sure overall submission quality is high, and sub is free of noise.
  • Trust janitors to weigh benefit versus noise and practice common sense with regards to highly upvoated posts.
  • Choose janitors carefully.

In more detail:

Noise is a problem, and currently a lot of it is being generated by careless friendlies rather than shills, which is why a set of rules consistently enforced is imperative.

But every once in a while, a well-thought-out, powerful submission will surface that only indirectly contributes to the investigation. Allowing those and drawing the line there is the way to go in my opinion. For example, a "this is how you can help with X" or a "reminder: we're losing focus of Y" post should be allowed in moderation (say, 1 out of 20 hot posts) if it adds value, but a not immediately relevant "this elite-related horrific thing is also happening" post should not. I'm under the impression that making the distinction here requires a human rather than a checklist, and that we should trust mods (or at least groups of mods, so we might require more than a single mod's vote) to remove or leave up this kind of content.

@kevdude, I can dedicate on average an hour or two of my time every day to the cause. Aiding a community comes naturally to me anyway. Please take a look at my track record.