First of all, thanks for addressing this. I favor letting voats decide, and calling for all lurkers to participate in that process. I have been guilty, at times, of having "unspent voats" for a 24 hour period when I know damn well there was upvoatable material. We have to send strong signals to win this thing against our formidable adversaries.

I think clarification about rules is very important, because I think there is a lot of genuine confusion / concern being misjudged as shill tactics .. etc. The same thing is taking place with the concern for the whereabouts / proof of life for Julian Assange. There are obviously disinfo agents abound, but we can't start suspecting that everyone that disagrees with us is one of them. This gets amplified by rule confusion.

As it currently stands, there is a rule in the meme thread that people may not be aware of. Memes may not be of use in a subverse focused on investigation (as they are considered "clutter"), so a separation of function may be ideal. I ask that this is formally stated in the rules in order to prevent confusion and loss of comments in discussion (as memes are migrated, at times losing valuable comments).

I think it's a good idea to have different subs for different functions. I also think, to the degree that it is relevant, additional subs can provide decentralization. This is good because it is robust.. but it is bad because fragmentation divides viewership and can become a chore. However, I think basically, pizzagate has become an ecosystem. There are enough good people in these spaces to loosely coordinate some guiding principles that transform this into a powerful movement for change.

Investigators looking for meme support, please come to /v/PizzagateMemes to discuss any memes want created.

All talented memers are encouraged to come as well. Come to weaponize the truth!