I vote for minimals standards enforced by moderation . Because accounts can be built up and multiplied by people with less than good intentions, voting power becomes a weapon against us. The balance of power can only be restored by affective moderation to keep content submission within the framework of this subs intention / purpose.
Addressing 3.2
I vote for separate subs to be created, which address specific aspects of pizza gate. I would even be in favour of having something called pizza gate shitposts where anything goes . Shills can post all they want there. But the title makes it clear that nothing is to be taken seriously .
As to the content of the rules to be applied for moderation , I would suggest looking closely at the documents published regarding how Shills operate . This kind of destructive behaviour can be profiled and actively defended against.
For the moderation of the janitors you pick , you should consider how to manage complaints in a transparent and effective way . Shills will inevitably try to bog down the system by escalating every single moderated post. Between the principles of transparency objectivity and fairness, Focus on transparency because objectivity and fairness are still subject of concepts and you will never be able to create a process that is both lightweight and fulfills all three of these principles.
I work with quality control of IT requirements management , so I have quite a bit of experience of assessing text based on a predefined checklist. I am not sure if I would be willing to put myself on a limb and do janitor cleanup , but I agree that it is necessary and a step in the right direction
I made /v/pizzagaterelated for offtopic/shitpost type stuff. There used to be a list of pizzagate related subs way down the page but it's gone now as they were basically all copies of this sub.
view the rest of the comments →
justanotherpizza ago
Adressing 3.1
I vote for minimals standards enforced by moderation . Because accounts can be built up and multiplied by people with less than good intentions, voting power becomes a weapon against us. The balance of power can only be restored by affective moderation to keep content submission within the framework of this subs intention / purpose.
Addressing 3.2
I vote for separate subs to be created, which address specific aspects of pizza gate. I would even be in favour of having something called pizza gate shitposts where anything goes . Shills can post all they want there. But the title makes it clear that nothing is to be taken seriously .
As to the content of the rules to be applied for moderation , I would suggest looking closely at the documents published regarding how Shills operate . This kind of destructive behaviour can be profiled and actively defended against.
For the moderation of the janitors you pick , you should consider how to manage complaints in a transparent and effective way . Shills will inevitably try to bog down the system by escalating every single moderated post. Between the principles of transparency objectivity and fairness, Focus on transparency because objectivity and fairness are still subject of concepts and you will never be able to create a process that is both lightweight and fulfills all three of these principles.
I work with quality control of IT requirements management , so I have quite a bit of experience of assessing text based on a predefined checklist. I am not sure if I would be willing to put myself on a limb and do janitor cleanup , but I agree that it is necessary and a step in the right direction
gopluckyourself ago
I made /v/pizzagaterelated for offtopic/shitpost type stuff. There used to be a list of pizzagate related subs way down the page but it's gone now as they were basically all copies of this sub.