Alright, guys. I went on a research splurge last night and here is the path I was led down. I got to think about the letter that Guccifer released to the main stream media.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/23/jailhouse-letter-guccifer-laments-failure-to-expose-crimes-rails-against-clinton.html
And he takes rhetorical aim at Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee: “Hillary Rodham Diane Clinton is one of the high priests, a goddess of this ocult, (sic) satanic, shadow group. One must see their evil and profoundly corrupt motive to understand what I am talking about.”
Then I got to thinking about that Moloch wikileak email I'm sure you have all seen.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333
With fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch . . .
So, I figured what the hell lets research some stuff on Moloch. Here is what I found. Yes, I know its wikipedia, but the info is consistent with other websites.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch
Moloch (Masoretic מֹלֶךְ mōlek, Greek Μολόχ) is the Biblical name relating to a Canaanite god associated with child sacrifice.
Who are the Canaanites?
List of their Deities: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Canaanite_religion#Beliefs
Canaanites come from a region called Canaan and is the equivalent of modern day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. Canaan was the region described as the Promised Land to the Hebrew people. In the Bible, the Canaanites were one of ten civilizations marked for extermination by the Hebrew God for their crimes against humanity. Their practices included rape, homosexuality, incest, beastiality, cannibalism and human sacrifice, including the worst of all kinds, child sacrifice (reference Moloch). The english word 'cannibal' comes from the combination of two words: Canaan and one of their Gods, Ba'al. The Hebrew culture as a result became intertwined with the Canaanites, and from my research I've concluded that Canaanites were forced underground by the Hebrews because of punishments for their behavior.
http://www.whale.to/c/curse_of_canaan.html
Then I got to thinking about their practices we are currently looking into regarding the podesta emails. We know podesta had cannibal art hanging in his office. The very foundation of this investigation is about Child abuse, molestation, rape and maybe even murder or sacrifice. Alefantis had instagram posts with a trio of people kneeling with strange masks on, leading us to believe it was apart of some strange ceremony or ritual. We have seen the strange behavior with this luzzato individual with her very own kids. The canaanites were open to sacrificing their first born children for demented benefits from the deities they worship.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sacrifice
Why is a Canaanite deity for fire and child sacrifice appearing in the Clinton emails?
For the record, when I started researching this I wasn't forcing my research in any which direction. This was the conclusion my research led me down, and the facts known in this investigation thus far is consistent with Canaanite beliefs. I've also noticed a lot of shills attempting to point this investigation towards the Jewish culture. By my research, Its easy to conclude that the Canaanites did not much appreciate the Hebrews for imposing themselves on their lands and claiming it as their Promised Land.
This is my best theory I've come across since the beginning of this mess. Everything known in the investigation points me in this direction. I've told my older brother of what I've come across. He is the one who turned me on to alternative media like zerohedge and has been ushering me towards the truth. My brother is skeptical of the same global establishment I am and frequently reads many articles and told me he is aware of the canaanites based on various articles he has bookmarked and will link to me. He also referred me to begin looking into the phoenicians, so I will follow up with more on this chain of research.
I'm sure I may have accidentally left out some things, so I will edit the post with any updates that I recall.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
It is widely agreed that the etymology of "cannibal" comes from the Carib Indians, not Canaan.
https://www.google.com/search?q=cannibal+etymology&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Flairing "accuracy in question."
John_The_Watchman ago
Throwing out the baby with the bathwater, eh? "It is widely agreed" - with all due respect: Wrong.
From "The Two Babylons" by Hisplop: The word Cahna is the emphatic form of Cahn. Cahn is "a priest," Cahna is "the priest". Priests of Nimrod or Baal were required to eat of the human sacrifices; and thus it has come to pass that "Cahna-Bal," * the "Priest of Baal," is the established word in our own tongue for a devourer of human flesh."
This is just one example of many such stipulations. It is not 'widely agreed'. With respect, I submit that you look further than wikipedia before making such declarations. I further request that you remove this flair, as the crux of this post is not etymology but rather history - the flair will have a detrimental effect upon the other fantastic information which has been presented here. Thank you.
Millennial_Falcon ago
This isn't just Wikipedia. It seems to be every dictionary ever. Note that the link I provided was a google search results list, not Wikipedia.
John_The_Watchman ago
Indeed. I simply dispute that it is "widely agreed" and further state that since the crux of this post is not etymology that your flair will have the misleading effect of bringing the other (historically accurate) information presented here into question. People need to see this post, flairing it in such a way will deter potential visitors.
Millennial_Falcon ago
I think agreement of every singly dictionary source is a fairly wide agreement. You still haven't provided even a single link to back up the etymology you claim.
Not if it contains disinformation, which is a poison pill. Remove the inaccurate bit, and I'll remove the flair. Fair enough?
John_The_Watchman ago
With respect, I'm not the OP. That said, I did provide a source (in the form of a book) in my response to your post. I'm unsure if the book is available online but within this page some quotes from said book are discussed, regarding said etymology: http://www.piney.com/Hisl71.html
There is also another book called "Curse of Caanan" which talks about this etymology, which is the source for OP's claim. Here are direct excepts from that book which are pertinent to this debate: http://www.whale.to/c/curse_of_canaan.html
Caribs came from somewhere - their words came from somewhere - and had their own etymology ((from somewhere)). They didn't just magically come up with the word, and we are talking about civilizations here (Phoenicians/Caananite) which existed LONG before the Caribs. The words Cahn and Baal are Phoenician/Hebrew. I stipulate, along with many others, that while Caribs may be one of the first on record in modern history to use this word - the word did not originate with them. Recognizing that Priests of Baal ate the flesh of their sacrifices only reinforces this assertion.