Trump did it.. 270 electoral votes acquired.. what does this mean for PizzaGate? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Guy_Fawkes1984

here's the story - http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-trump-passes-270-electoral-votes-1482172091-htmlstory.html

So let me explain my view on this whole thing... I believe PizzaGate is probably real (not enough evidence to say definitely)... If it is in fact real, that would mean that not only Hillary and Podesta but dozens if not 100s of other government officials are totally and utterly FUCKED if Trump becomes president..

This is something that I've been wrestling with.. because if that is the case, you would expect that these dozens of people would absolutely find whatever means possible to stop Trump. As a result, I totally thought today would go differently. I genuinely believed that through some blackmailing shady shit that enough electors were going to switch their vote to stop Trump and put in some random compromised Republican that wouldn't rat out PizzaGate..

Now that that officially hasn't happened, I'm totally confused. Are we to actually believe that all of PizzaGate is real and Hillary, Podesta, and everyone else are just going to wait patiently for their ultimate demise? That is just stupid... If this is really true they have a couple options: 1. run away (which they haven't done) 2. Stop Trump (Monica Petersen style)

Does what I'm saying make sense or am I going crazy? I mean really stop and think about what Trumps presidency means to this entire fucked up organized criminal endeavor? How can these people just sit back idly? Either they are going to do something VERY Drastic, or this whole thing just doesnt make sense to me anymore. Any thoughts?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Spindle ago

You're right, it's no good to canonize someone, especially an anonymous someone from a chan. It is undeniable that the side-by-side wide breadth of issues he responded to, however, and their corresponding prescience has been convincing enough to keep his name around. It's also no good to dismiss entirely.

But "assassinating major figures is very difficult and dangerous" most likely -- if we are to take FBIAnon seriously as an insider and understand the context of the quote among all seven AMAs -- he is most likely not referring to available assassination technology, but the ramifications of taking down so public and divisive a figure after so contentious an election. I think the difficulty and danger he was referring to here is social, civil, and/or political, and my other quote was to highlight that a bit. There are more supporting quotes regarding the elite and their control over a roiling populace, though they are not as directly related.