Trump did it.. 270 electoral votes acquired.. what does this mean for PizzaGate? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Guy_Fawkes1984

here's the story - http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-trump-passes-270-electoral-votes-1482172091-htmlstory.html

So let me explain my view on this whole thing... I believe PizzaGate is probably real (not enough evidence to say definitely)... If it is in fact real, that would mean that not only Hillary and Podesta but dozens if not 100s of other government officials are totally and utterly FUCKED if Trump becomes president..

This is something that I've been wrestling with.. because if that is the case, you would expect that these dozens of people would absolutely find whatever means possible to stop Trump. As a result, I totally thought today would go differently. I genuinely believed that through some blackmailing shady shit that enough electors were going to switch their vote to stop Trump and put in some random compromised Republican that wouldn't rat out PizzaGate..

Now that that officially hasn't happened, I'm totally confused. Are we to actually believe that all of PizzaGate is real and Hillary, Podesta, and everyone else are just going to wait patiently for their ultimate demise? That is just stupid... If this is really true they have a couple options: 1. run away (which they haven't done) 2. Stop Trump (Monica Petersen style)

Does what I'm saying make sense or am I going crazy? I mean really stop and think about what Trumps presidency means to this entire fucked up organized criminal endeavor? How can these people just sit back idly? Either they are going to do something VERY Drastic, or this whole thing just doesnt make sense to me anymore. Any thoughts?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SIMONBARROW ago

Comments: (1) if Pizzagate were not real, then the top people in the Democratic Party (Clinton, Podesta, etc.) wrote these emails over the last 5 or 6 years with the deliberate intention of leading us all down the garden path, knowing all the while that they would eventually be released by Wikileaks during the 2016 campaign and would lead to them almost certainly losing the election. Such a scenario seems even more improbable than the wildest versions of Pizzagate. (2) A complete change in the administration means that heads will roll. However, it's likely the ones at the top like Podesta will get off with a slap on the wrist.

mysecretidentity ago

You don't think these people are capable of planning 6 years in advance? Soros was backing Trump too, and within one generation the whole Trump clan will be Jewish. These plans are literally centuries old. Never underestimate the zionists.

SIMONBARROW ago

How has Soros been backing Trump? And, if he has been, why would he bother funding the anti-Trump riots and all the opposition to Trump in the media? If he was - as you suggest - backing both horses, then it wouldn't matter to him who won the election as he would win either way. This theory just doesn't make any sense and sound like paranoia to me.

mysecretidentity ago

destabilization is the name of his game

Guy_Fawkes1984 ago

I think PG is a huge enterprise with 100s of people involved over many years. But, I dont believe its a hundred years old and I don't think this entire charade was one big planned event.. there's no way, they are clearly fumbling a little bit