Clooooooose. Still not quite there tho.
Mention the dutroux case ask the questions tell us that they tried to cover it up. This is still low effort. The article is maybe worthy of a link in a bigger post but not a solo post.
edit: /v/pizzarelated has been created! please post this there!
While this is a very sad story and awful to hear that she had to go through that this is not pizzagate related. This isn't relevant to pizzagate. MOOOOOOODDDDS /u/kingkongwaswrong [O] /u/Melitica [J] /u/Crensch [O] /u/numbchuck [J] /u/KnowThyself [M] /u/heygeorge [D] /u/VictorSteinerDavion [O] /u/Phobos_Mothership [M] /u/Millennial_Falcon [M] /u/RedGreenAlliance [J] 2. Posts not about PIZZAGATE specifically will be removed. 3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
This is relevant. Pizzagate/pedogate is a worldwide fenomenon and I'm using this brave woman's testimony to spread awareness in my and her country, Belgium. This will definately help to have people listening to a story they would otherwise find too unrealistic.
This is an appeal to emotion to further your argument.
Argue using logic with me please.
The statement, "we can share this article with people to sway them through the use of an emotional appeal to convince them to look farther into the pizza gate investigation," is accurate. And I agree with it. So make that statement in your post. Post it to social media linking to pizza gate. Don't however tell me that this does any of these things.
EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation.
Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
I am very glad you are reposting to social media tho!! Keep up the good work.
view the rest of the comments →
gopluckyourself ago
Clooooooose. Still not quite there tho.
Mention the dutroux case ask the questions tell us that they tried to cover it up. This is still low effort. The article is maybe worthy of a link in a bigger post but not a solo post. edit: /v/pizzarelated has been created! please post this there! While this is a very sad story and awful to hear that she had to go through that this is not pizzagate related. This isn't relevant to pizzagate. MOOOOOOODDDDS /u/kingkongwaswrong [O] /u/Melitica [J] /u/Crensch [O] /u/numbchuck [J] /u/KnowThyself [M] /u/heygeorge [D] /u/VictorSteinerDavion [O] /u/Phobos_Mothership [M] /u/Millennial_Falcon [M] /u/RedGreenAlliance [J] 2. Posts not about PIZZAGATE specifically will be removed. 3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
idontlikesalmon ago
This is relevant. Pizzagate/pedogate is a worldwide fenomenon and I'm using this brave woman's testimony to spread awareness in my and her country, Belgium. This will definately help to have people listening to a story they would otherwise find too unrealistic.
gopluckyourself ago
This is an appeal to emotion to further your argument.
Argue using logic with me please.
The statement, "we can share this article with people to sway them through the use of an emotional appeal to convince them to look farther into the pizza gate investigation," is accurate. And I agree with it. So make that statement in your post. Post it to social media linking to pizza gate. Don't however tell me that this does any of these things.
idontlikesalmon ago
I am posting this to social media linking it to PG. I don't get your last sentence, though.
gopluckyourself ago
I am very glad you are reposting to social media tho!! Keep up the good work.