You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

gopluckyourself ago

Clooooooose. Still not quite there tho.
Mention the dutroux case ask the questions tell us that they tried to cover it up. This is still low effort. The article is maybe worthy of a link in a bigger post but not a solo post. edit: /v/pizzarelated has been created! please post this there! While this is a very sad story and awful to hear that she had to go through that this is not pizzagate related. This isn't relevant to pizzagate. MOOOOOOODDDDS /u/kingkongwaswrong [O] /u/Melitica [J] /u/Crensch [O] /u/numbchuck [J] /u/KnowThyself [M] /u/heygeorge [D] /u/VictorSteinerDavion [O] /u/Phobos_Mothership [M] /u/Millennial_Falcon [M] /u/RedGreenAlliance [J] 2. Posts not about PIZZAGATE specifically will be removed. 3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.

shakethetree ago

It is relevant because it puts a face on what is happening to these very children we are trying to save from trauma. It is people's humanity. It is through the heart that we will reach our fellow human beings. First hand testimony of survivors is primary source information. We want more people to feel safe coming forward. If you want to get technical on the reference to Pizzagate research, then you are correct in that there is no direct link at this time.

gopluckyourself ago

Not even that if you want this to be part of the pizzagate psyops to help convince people of our cause then sure go for that. Pretty sure there are already threads and stuff for discussing that tho. /v/PizzagateMemes is one of the ones in the sidebar.

shakethetree ago

I am struggling to make sense of what you are trying to say as there is a lack of coherence in your thought-stream. If you want to make this an issue regarding relevance, I won't try to stop you as that is your choice. I feel integrity in my position.

2impendingdoom ago

This guy seems to have a problem with your testimonial account of sexual abuse of a child by elites in Europe. The title and content speak for themselves.

gopluckyourself ago

I'll restate it another way then.
The sidebar rules make some excellent points as far as how to make a post.
2. Posts not about PIZZAGATE specifically will be removed.
3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation.
7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
This post does none of these things.
There are propaganda efforts to redpill the masses into buying into pizzagate. If this post is related to that then state that point in the title or make a text post linking to this article. As it stands I have no idea what you're trying to say with this post. It is literally only about a victim of a case of pedophilia as you have framed it. You have stated pedophilia of europeans elite in it but have not provided anything else. Ask the questions you want answered or make a connection. edit: otherwise this is just signal noise instead of content.