You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Godwillwin ago

I'm too tired to read a bunch of stuff-been researching for the past 2 hours and drained after listening to that beautiful 15 year old Teresa from London or Australia?? tell her story. My heart is broken

Can you give synopsis of this article?

B3nd3r ago

It's the Book "Mind Control, World Control: The Encyclopedia of Mind Control" from 1997 by Jim Keith that you could buy on Amazon for $10.

Here's one Review from a verified buyer:

As other reviewers have stated, this book lacks depth in the worst way. In the first four chapters alone dozens of characters are name-dropped, then disappear with the flick of the author's fingers on the keys that compose his next sentence. Just keeping up with the names, after one or two sentences are devoted to them, becomes an inordinate feat in itself, and it serves to distract from the supposed overall purpose of the book: to serve as the "Encyclopedia of Mind Control."

The vast majority of his assertions about these supposedly key-players are pure innuendo. "Allegedly...", "It is believed that", "Many think that...." Oh really? Prove it! I know from other documented sources, like Carol Rutz's "A Nation Betrayed" and John Marks' book "The Search for the Manchurian Candidate" that some of his assertions about chronology and people are in fact true. The rest? Well, I guess we'll never know, because this author has the irritating habit of making allegations without any apparent intention of backing them up with a shred of traceable fact. Not just allegations, mind you. He does the same thing, repeatedly, with actual quotations and events that would be cited in a more scholarly book where the author cares about his credibility. Apparently the author is such an illustrious researcher that we're just supposed to take his word for it, carte blanche, without being empowered to poke around in the facts for ourselves.

The overall effect is not just sloppy. It's insulting to anyone who cares about actually validating the existence and use of mind control methods by the people who hold positions of power in the US and globally. Even if some of the quotes were traceable from the few citations he does provide, it would require reading whole books to do so, because this grade-school level author didn't provide page numbers. Absolutely unacceptable! On page 58, as citation for a supposed 1978 NIMH study, he lists a paper in 1948! I won't waste my time trying to discern if the rest of his citations are legitimate. This author is beneath the level of skill and scholarly integrity necessary to make a salient case for the existence and use of government- and corporate-funded mind control.

With few citations, no validation of actual technology using, say, easily obtainable patent numbers, and little concern for an entirely factual representation, "Encyclopedia of Mind Control" this book is NOT! This is the kind of book that gives books on mind control a bad name! If you want real, scholarly research from people who care deeply about the issues and want to get to the truth, try the Carol Rutz book mentioned above and check out "Controlling the Human Mind" by Dr. Nick Begich. You will find actual, declassified proof in these excellent, well-cited sources. I believe John Marks' book has some useful information but I also believe his overall tone and direction are intended as disinformation, not as an honest look at the all the facts available to him. If you are looking for more information globalists conspiring to strip citizens of their rights, a trusted source has recommended both Stan Monteith's "Brotherhood of Darkness" and "Hope of the Wicked" by Ted Flynn. I haven't had the chance to read them yet, but now that I have thrown Jim Keith's book in the toilet maybe I'll have time soon.

TL;DR: It's garbage.