I feel its important to not only look at the facts, but to also evaluate the responses of the those who have had very serious accusations made against them. The very behavior they display can be very telling and at least show that people are on the right track. This is supposed to be a sub meant for true investigation, and psychological investigation should be every bit as much a part of it. Yet we are discouraging it in almost every sense by demanding proof of thoughts? This is not a 2 day open and shut investigation, open your ears to those shouting out to you
view the rest of the comments →
ThighHighSwampBoots ago
You are 100% right! A lot of pedos, psychos learn NLP, (neurolinguistic programming) just like politicians and preachers do, to convince, persuade or dissuade an audience. I'm sure they also learned NOT to do the usual giveaways of liars, like looking up and to the left, etc. The experts have really evaluated the parents of Madelaine McCann for their body language, to an extreme degree. It's very helpful to the overall picture. Looks exchanged between suspects, people rushing to their ex-lovers house to show their phone texts, etc. The old saying "two men can keep a secret if one is dead" comes to mind. People turn on each other. None of this is happening in a vacuum. "Give me a man's brother", and he'll turn on him, that quote from "Dr. Zhivago", by Boris Pasternak. Great insight, Platypus!
SecureYourSeats ago
Renee (Eyes for Lies) doesn't look for those "tells", she has actually made comments to the fact of their unreliability. She spells it out logically where the subject is lying and what makes it so obvious to her. I believe Alefantis has already said enough to give Renee lots to go on. She's good, she used to blog on cases in the public eye and her thoughts are still available on her web page. Also Peter Hyatt. Both of them have analysed the McCanns. Peter in a youtube video and Renee on her Eyes for lies blog page.
Queen_Puabi ago
Do you have links?