Psychologically speaking, what's interesting to me is that John "Pedosta" Pedesto isn't speaking.

Alefantis has given some statements and softball interviews, but its interesting that Pedosta is silent on this. It's obviously not proof of innocence or guilt, but it's very fascinating to me.

I'm not a psychologist, but if I was in Pedosta's position of being accused of the most horrendous crimes against children by tens of thousands or more people on the internet, I'd probably come out with a statement that first said that crimes against children are awful and that the accusations are serious, say that the alternative art scene might be viewed as strange by many people but is just a form of peaceful self-expression, I didn't do that and would never do it and would give as much evidence as possible to clear my name as I could. I'd invite the media to search my house (even if it was just for show) and outwardly do as much possible to show that I have nothing to hide. I'd also talk about my work with some piece of legislation or charity to show how much I cared about the well-being of children and how that's been a priority in his political career with the Clintons. With his media connections, he can easily get put out a professional press release to make himself look good and garner sympathy about what he's going through and make himself look like a victim.

So why doesn't he do this?

If he's somehow innocent, and this is a psyop in some form or another is he waiting and hoping that a bunch of Alex Jones types libel him so he could sue them into oblivion down the road?