As you probably read already, a load of files in wikileaks had their date mysteriously changed to "01-Jan-1984 01:01"
If you google "nineteen eighty-four 0101" these are the two first pages:
http://www.yesnovel.com/nineteen-eighty-four-george-orwell?page=0,101
http://www.novelok.com/nineteen-eighty-four?page=0,101
In page 102 of the first link you will find:
"The door opened. The cold-faced young officer stepped into the cell. With a brief movement of the hand he indicated Ampleforth.
'Room 101,' he said."
The main character is imprisoned in that section of the book, the room is 101, the dates are clearly not a coincidence.
Julian Assange has been taken, do not believe anything they say until you see him, do not trust Wikileaks, do not leak to Wikileaks, download the files from the torrents if you have to and minimize your exposure to the website.
view the rest of the comments →
it_was_foretold ago
that can easily be forged. easily
brbomglolwtfbbq ago
I'm pretty sure that was him. Whether he was under duress our something is a different story.
ThorTheWonderful ago
They used his old recording and created a computer reconstruction, blending audio, changing pitch, tone, speed etc to make it sound natural. BUT I heard oddities.
His spoken words always ended abruptly with no hss at the end.
His spoken words were often so close together, it would be unreasonable to think it natural.
The static sound of the phone! Audio feed back cancellation causes silence, when the speaker on the phone goes silent and when the speaker makes noise, the audio resumes and you should here the static only while he is speaking. In this interview, the opposite is the case.
If you reduce the speed and maintain the key, you can hear short cuts in the sound, this indicates noise cancellation of unwanted background noise.
Speaking of speed, Julian seems to be talking faster than he normally does.
If you play the recording at reduced speed while maintaining the correct key, you can hear other background sounds at about 16:20 in to the recording, it sounds like Hannity's voice but at normal speed. This indicates that this was edited and not live!
I am sure I had other points to make but I don't have proper software or a studio to give this a good listen to.
brbomglolwtfbbq ago
But the interview was live though right?
ThorTheWonderful ago
It was edited, it couldn't be live!