I would love to hear your thoughts. My greatest hope is that he is still alive, but I am very interested in those who can find falsehood in this interview.
I'm listening to the interview at the moment, the sound of static almost seems like an overlay (normally you get static with the voice and silence in between), Julians voice cuts in and out quickly, and words are often so close together it seems a bit un-natural and there seems to be a bit of a chopping in some of the voice of Julian. As if excessive filtering. Also at about 16:20 I can here what sounds like editing room background at a different speed, there is a voice that sounds like Hannity can be heard clearly when slowed by 0.500x without changing key.
At normal speed it also sounds like Julian is speaking faster than normal. If they used advanced audio editing, they can change the sounds of the voice and piece words in context with adjustment to tone and pitch to effectively blend the sound of contextual speech. It can be done in such a way, nobody would be able to notice. I think this would be beyond my capability of any further analysis.
Better software to see the sound graph and a studio where this can cranked to hear the details.
At best I have to say it sounds authentic, but I am a skeptic first and foremost. I can't hear any flaws bad enough to call it a dead give away.
view the rest of the comments →
ThorTheWonderful ago
NOPE!!!! Give me a week or so, I am going through recording of Assange interviews to see if I can find audio similarities.
IsThisThingSafe ago
I would love to hear your thoughts. My greatest hope is that he is still alive, but I am very interested in those who can find falsehood in this interview.
ThorTheWonderful ago
I'm listening to the interview at the moment, the sound of static almost seems like an overlay (normally you get static with the voice and silence in between), Julians voice cuts in and out quickly, and words are often so close together it seems a bit un-natural and there seems to be a bit of a chopping in some of the voice of Julian. As if excessive filtering. Also at about 16:20 I can here what sounds like editing room background at a different speed, there is a voice that sounds like Hannity can be heard clearly when slowed by 0.500x without changing key.
At normal speed it also sounds like Julian is speaking faster than normal. If they used advanced audio editing, they can change the sounds of the voice and piece words in context with adjustment to tone and pitch to effectively blend the sound of contextual speech. It can be done in such a way, nobody would be able to notice. I think this would be beyond my capability of any further analysis.
Better software to see the sound graph and a studio where this can cranked to hear the details.
At best I have to say it sounds authentic, but I am a skeptic first and foremost. I can't hear any flaws bad enough to call it a dead give away.