Saw this today and it made me wonder what some people would make of (2)
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB18
""The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that all children and youth, regardless of gender, class, race, ethnicity, national origin, culture, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, or ability, have inherent rights that entitle them to protection, special care, and assistance, including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest.
(2) The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being.
(3) The right to live in a safe and healthy environment.
(4) The right to social and emotional well-being.
(5) The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development.
(6) The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood.
(7) The right to appropriate, quality health care."
It could be read as a green-light for adult/child relationships if the child 'consents'.
The whole point of age laws for children is because they are not considered capable of informed consent and therefore protected by said law.
view the rest of the comments →
TRUTHWARRIOR ago
Off topic tha5 desperately needs attention. This might be a rabbit hole for another day. Thanks for posting tho.
norobotono ago
Not fully off-topic which is why I put it here because it may be missed otherwise. It goes towards more evidence of a seemingly concerted effort to legitimize child sexual abuse.
If it's legal they don't have to cover it up anymore and suspected csa scenarios like pizzagate will then be ignored.
TRUTHWARRIOR ago
Well said