Just wanted to note this, as it might go under the radar. General Flynn deleted his tweet yesterday.
"U decide - NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes w Children, etc...MUST READ!"
Originally posted Nov 2, 2016. Deleted December 14, 2016.
Here is the archived tweet.
This article was also in the tweet.
LostandFound ago
Good spot, can we fire this over to the PG censored list? I cant seem to locate that now, on mobile not tinfoilhattery.
SheSaidDestroy ago
It has been attacked as "fake news" by multiple people/sites:
https://twitter.com/true_pundit/status/793842646808563716 https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/true-pundit/ http://www.fakenewschecker.com/fake-news-source/true-pundit?page=56
The reason being that the sources were unnamed/anonymous NYPD staff, so no proof.
But at the same time, Washington Post was not called fake news when its source consisted of unnamed "U.S. officials" with no proof.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?utm_term=.d489f119588c
And also received several thousands of comments expressing blind belief in the unnamed/anonymous sources (while also mocking fake news in some cases) and were not considered gullible or crazy by the MSM for doing so.
Why is there a difference in standards?