You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

We need to exercise skepticism here. If O'Brien is for real, why hasn't she been suicided? She's been saying this stuff for years. All this reeks of disinformation, which is the main weapon the enemy is using to disrupt our efforts. They want to get us labeled as tinfoil hatters. As far as I'm aware, O'Brien never supplies anything resembling evidence to back her claims (anyone who has a source indicating otherwise, please provide it). It would be relatively easy for CIA black projects to fund fake victim-witnesses who accuse everyone of everything, and mix in a lot of sensational nonsense, and before long, nobody is paying attention anymore. That's how disinformation works.

hedy ago

Serious question: How old are you? The younger you are, the more apt to thinking PG is an "event" in-and-of-itself with no history or context.

Anyone who has studied the subvert, covert knows that the more public someone speaks out, the less likely they are to be "suicided". Not always (plenty of examples of notable people being killed) but it is one way to help yourself.

Also, there is some benefit in disinformation. This doesn't mean that she has no relevant or accurate information but it's definitely not the whole story and may involve some disinformation. As with Ted Gunderson, doesn't make her irrelevant.

Millennial_Falcon ago

How old are you? The younger you are, the more apt to thinking PG is an "event" in-and-of-itself with no history or context.

I'm not going to provide identifying information, but I'm very aware that PG is not an isolated event, and that this has been going on for decades (millennia, really).

Also, there is some benefit in disinformation.

It's a poison pill. It may seem to taste nice at first, but it would poison our efforts.

hedy ago

No, it's part of the "story" and there is very likely relevant info - not all of it is disnfo. You have to know enough about the larger context to be able to determine what is/isn't accurate. That takes time, more information and critical thought. Nothing should get dismissed outright - that, alone, is suspicious.

ETA: Also, you labeled this "irrelevant" - yet are saying it is disinformation. Which is it?

Millennial_Falcon ago

you labeled this "irrelevant"

No, I did not.