That's the problem. But like with 9/11 truth it might get more people interested if people realise the sheer number of people who still think something is going on despite the MSM telling us otherwise, telling us that it has been debunked. We do not believe them.

Half of all people do not even believe the official 9/11 story anymore. This is probably an example of how discussing the subject with others and questioning the narrative of it can make people question if there is something wrong with the narrative. It can also change people's perceptions of who believes in these sort of things. For example If you originally thought something like pizzagate supporters were all nutcases and then realise someone say a close friend or a relative who is the most stable sophisticated person you know believes pizzagate then you might change your mind about who believes pizzagate, how many people believe it and why they believe it.

I used to believe the official 9/11 story. What made me question the official story was all those engineers were wondering how steel could be weakened so easily at such a relatively low temperature. Then I found a report an engineer made saying how the steel in the trade centres is in fact this is the same sort of steel they use in nuclear reactors which get much hotter than what the trade centre fires could, and how in a reactor the steel is at this temperature for longer periods than the duration of the steel in the trade centre due to the fires in the building. Reactors do get real hot and they're made of steel. That was the final proof for me.

Long story. Hope that makes sense to you.