No, it is old information. There are a slew of emails from this guy, 2 of which are other stratfor employees forwarding to his dad out of concern. The guy just mashes up conspiracy and his own crazy rant.
can you prove that statement there is no code in this(these)? im not a crypto guy so i couldn't possibly just start breaking any possible code in this...
but i can tell you what i know about stratfor: it's [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored] and [censored] [censored] [censored] but then [censored] [censored] [censored] and every time they [censored] [censored] [censored] never before has anyone seen a [censored] [censored] [censored]
source for that? how can you prove those two statements?
Wow, logic is not strong with this one.
Till you can prove that there is a code, then logically you must take it at face value and that is a nonsensical rant of fringe conspiracy mixed with his own original brand of crazy.
Till you can prove that there is a code, then logically you must take it at face value and that is a nonsensical rant of fringe conspiracy mixed with his own original brand of crazy.
incorrect.
we cannot take anything at face value.
distraction account (whether personal or tied to an org doesn't matter) confirmed.
Till you can prove that you are a human, then logically i must take it at face value and that is a line of distraction with your own original brand of crazy.
view the rest of the comments →
Godwillwin ago
Change your title so people look into this and upvote. This global intelligence Stratfor group is weird and seems like a cover for something
SaneGoatiSwear ago
yeah this has an embedded code message for a problem that needs dealing with quickly. too quickly to go through the normal encrypted channels.
codebreakers need to look at this.
repost with title: "codebreakers possibly needed. is this a hastily put together coded message through stratfor?"
totesgoats908234 ago
No, it is old information. There are a slew of emails from this guy, 2 of which are other stratfor employees forwarding to his dad out of concern. The guy just mashes up conspiracy and his own crazy rant.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
a good cover.
can you prove that
statementthere is no code in this(these)? im not a crypto guy so i couldn't possibly just start breaking any possible code in this...but i can tell you what i know about stratfor: it's [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored] and [censored] [censored] [censored] but then [censored] [censored] [censored] and every time they [censored] [censored] [censored] never before has anyone seen a [censored] [censored] [censored]
totesgoats908234 ago
What a silly statement. I don't have to prove anything. There is no code till someone proves it exists.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
no, and i don't have to take into account a single of your highly likely shill comments deriding investigations down good rabbit holes.
totesgoats908234 ago
Don't let me stop you. Go wild with your superior logic.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
you are suggesting something in a wikileaks MUST not have any meaningful data in it because what? guy's crazy/on pills?
source for that? how can you prove those two statements?
you are dismissing possible evidence without any evidence to base dismissing it on.
totesgoats908234 ago
Wow, logic is not strong with this one.
Till you can prove that there is a code, then logically you must take it at face value and that is a nonsensical rant of fringe conspiracy mixed with his own original brand of crazy.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
incorrect.
we cannot take anything at face value.
distraction account (whether personal or tied to an org doesn't matter) confirmed.
Till you can prove that you are a human, then logically i must take it at face value and that is a line of distraction with your own original brand of crazy.
totesgoats908234 ago
You are really, really dumb. Good luck with being you.