Yeah, and someone in this thread already posted some evidence of him going to those spiritcooking parties. He's definitely suspicious. That said, I posted my comment before knowing that and, given what I knew at the time, it made perfect sense. I'm just reluctant to say, "Look, this guy works for a charity that helps children, therefore he must be a pedophile." That line of thinking is dangerous and undermines legitimately good people who just want to help kids. Sure, there are lots of people trying to exploit children under the guise of charity work, but you need evidence before jumping to that conclusion.