Wow! We started with Podesta, ping pong, and pizza-map handkerchies, and now we're at Saudis, Satanic rituals, and sick child molesters. What a ride.

Let's take a step back. We've got to start thinking about all this as a legitimate investigation. All this searching is awesome, but it's about time we had a good, solid summary of where we're at, and a plan forward.

It looks like FBIanon was spot on. The Clinton Foundation is right in the middle of a giant ring of criminal behavior.

I think it might be better to start looking at the Clinton Foundation as a mafia organization. Everything they do is to make money and manage assets. So yeah, they might kill a guy. They might sell some kids. But overall, I don't think they are as crazy as we're making them out to be. Reckless, but not crazy. There are many reasons they might do something that we would consider horrible, and many ways they could justify it to themselves. All the variables change what evidence will be present.

For example, we can bet some of the pedophile stuff is actually for the purpose of blackmail. And child porn... it could have infants, or 17-year-olds, and to us it's all horrible but the evidence is going to be different for each case. Trafficking can be as innocuous as convincing a girl she'll have a better life being a prostitute and flying her to another country where she has an apartment and a pimp, or kidnapping, shipping and selling her to someone with a kill room in their basement. They are all bad, but they are also all different. The only commonality is that they make money, or they keep someone happy.

As terrible as these atrocities are to us, to Soros and the Clintons and the Saudis and Chinese and many more who they deal with, it's just business. These people aren't sitting around a cauldron all week cooking up a witches brew, they're making deals. The cauldron is on the weekends.

I honestly wonder if Hillary really did eat a dead person or two and that's why she's showing signs of Kuru. Maybe. But eating dead people isn't her main motivation, most likely. It's just a weird thing she did that time back in college with the Satanists or on a weekend at the Podesta's or whatever. Yes she's evil, but she's not stupid. Neither is Soros, although he's probably senile as FBIanon says. They will make stupid mistakes, but not everything they do is motivated by a weird fetish for being super evil (probably). It's just business.

Here's the reason I think we need to look at it this way. If we start seeing these people as dealmakers, then it'll make figuring them out way easier. Like, again, FBIanon said, follow the money.

This backwards-ass way of looking for clues in people's basement is even beyond Alex Jones level wackoness. I'm not saying there's nothing to it, just that we're wasting time. We need to act fast and get to the facts that will prosecute, not get angry about the horrors that these people are capable of. Imagine the worst thing, and they will do it. They've done it, and they'll do it again if it means $1 more for them. Yes, it's horrible. That's what mafias do. Now lets move on to the money.

Basically what we have to do is start breaking down how much money was spent by whom, on what, when, and what happened because of it. That's really it. We need to start at the beginning and track where money went, what for, and if we can put together a good case, then all this work and disgust will accomplish something.

The only thing we need to decide is how far back should we start, and what size of transactions should we focus on. Any suggestions?