Are shills accusing pizzagate researchers of being shills? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Platypus43

There has been a common theme here, in which the top post in this sub have a bountiful amount of comments accusing and insinuating the op is a shill. It's honestly been going on for quite some time but has gotten to the point that you can read a post full of legitimate information and leads, and before you get 5 comments in someone is calling the op a shill. I firmly believe that the opposition is working overtime to discredit this sub and the hard work and research being done here. It might not be a bad idea to take note of those calling people shills for posting legitimate research and findings.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

CJJacobs ago

Or are pizzagate researchers accusing shills of being shills?

It's very hard sometimes to tell who is on Team Sanity and fighting for the children and who isn''t.

We do have very good shills here -- although they do seem to only be here at certain hours of the day -- who will pretend to be for the cause of exposing pizzagate, but who will mix in some misinformation or disinformation alongside good information.

A person needs to check comment histories for patterns...those provide a strong clue. You should also look at things like how long a person has been on voat (although that is not always revealing, sometimes it is)...and whether or not the comments a person makes are helping to keep a discussion on track, or taking it in a direction of confusion and fog. Stay wary ...even of mods.

Use the trivium (logical reasoning) as much as possible and watch for logical fallacies. And pray for divine help if you are a praying person!

A lot of traps have been set. Be on your guard. Review the procedures of CTR posted in this subverse. That will awaken you to the techniques that they use.

All the best.

kekistocrat ago

Also, the shills come to each others' aid. Within minutes sometimes. Keep track of these names that will come to their defense. I've noticed a definite pattern. I noticed this logical fallacy problem too and thought I would post something about the trivium: 17 votes, 4 of those were downvotes. I think that the voaters think it's too nerdy, or something. Perhaps we try to simply point out fallacies, one by one. Regards. Keep exposing the shillfactor.