Are shills accusing pizzagate researchers of being shills? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Platypus43

There has been a common theme here, in which the top post in this sub have a bountiful amount of comments accusing and insinuating the op is a shill. It's honestly been going on for quite some time but has gotten to the point that you can read a post full of legitimate information and leads, and before you get 5 comments in someone is calling the op a shill. I firmly believe that the opposition is working overtime to discredit this sub and the hard work and research being done here. It might not be a bad idea to take note of those calling people shills for posting legitimate research and findings.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BlueBerryPie ago

FACT-PROVEN: 31 days ago /reddit shutdown pizzagate, on that day king-kong-mod ( real life CTR ) created this sub

This sub is an orchestrated limited hangout to destroy the pizzagate investigation.

Note carefully that these shills who slide and destroy all OP's are always backed up by the MOD's who later mark the OP as "debunked' well after 100's of good people have posted evidence.

I think this post is a shit-post by a shill, but the real enemy here is the OWNERS of CTR and the MOD who created this subverse

reasonedandinformed ago

BY the way, BlueFool, Reddit stopped on 11/22. You guys can't get ANY facts right. Go back to CTR training.